Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22106226›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Influence of body weight, ethnicity, oral contraceptives, and pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in women of childbearing age.

James H Fischer, Gloria E Sarto, Mitra Habibi, Sarah J Kilpatrick, Ruth E Tuomala, Janice M Shier, Lori Wollett, Patricia A Fischer, Kinnari S Khorana, Keith A Rodvold

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Sarah J. Kilpatrick, MD, PhD, Editor for AJOG.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Basic obstetric pharmacology.Seminars in perinatology · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James H FischerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. jfischer@uic.edu
Gloria E Sarto
Mitra Habibi
Sarah J Kilpatrick
Ruth E Tuomala
Janice M Shier
Lori Wollett
Patricia A Fischer
Kinnari S Khorana
Keith A Rodvold
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

WOMEN'S INTERAGENCY HIV STUDY (WIHS) ANTIRETROVIRAL TREATMENT EXPOSURE/INTENSIVEM01RR013987 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BUTTRICK, PETER · 2000 to 2004
$9.2M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR013987NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR-13987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women of childbearing age commonly receive azithromycin for the treatment of community-acquired infections, including during pregnancy. This study determined azithromycin pharmacokinetics in pregnant and nonpregnant women and identified covariates contributing to pharmacokinetic variability. Plasma samples were collected by using a sparse-sampling strategy from pregnant women at a gestational age of 12 to 40 weeks and from nonpregnant women of childbearing age receiving oral azithromycin for the treatment of an infection. Pharmacokinetic data from extensive sampling conducted on 12 healthy women were also included. Plasma samples were assayed for azithromycin by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The population analysis included 53 pregnant and 25 nonpregnant women. A three-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time provided the best fit of the data. Lean body weight, pregnancy, ethnicity, and the coadministration of oral contraceptives were covariates identified as significantly influencing the oral clearance of azithromycin and, except for oral contraceptive use, intercompartmental clearance between the central and second peripheral compartments. No other covariate relationships were identified. Compared to nonpregnant women not receiving oral contraceptives, a 21% to 42% higher dose-adjusted azithromycin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) occurred in non-African American women who were pregnant or receiving oral contraceptives. Conversely, azithromycin AUCs were similar between pregnant African American women and nonpregnant women not receiving oral contraceptives. Although higher levels of maternal and fetal azithromycin exposure suggest that lower doses be administered to non-African American women during pregnancy, the consideration of azithromycin pharmacodynamics during pregnancy should guide any dose adjustments.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArea Under CurveAzithromycinBody WeightChromatography, High Pressure LiquidContraceptives, OralEthnicityFemaleGestational AgeHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung AdultAzithromycinContraceptives, Oral

Identifiers

PMID22106226
PMCPMC3264225
OpenAlexW1998969952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.