Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22106069›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2012

Alignment and composition of laminin-polycaprolactone nanofiber blends enhance peripheral nerve regeneration.

Rebekah A Neal, Sunil S Tholpady, Patricia L Foley, Nathan Swami, Roy C Ogle, Edward A Botchwey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebekah A NealDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908.
Sunil S Tholpady
Patricia L Foley
Nathan Swami
Roy C Ogle
Edward A Botchwey
University of Virginia · USOld Dominion University · US

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008715 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI LAURIE, GORDON WILLIAM · 2000 to 2019
$6.6M
REGULATION OF CRANIALSUTURE MORPHOGENESISR01DE010369 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI OGLE, ROY CLINTON · 1994 to 2002
$912k
NIDCR NIH HHS DE-010369-08NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE010369NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM008715-08NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve transection occurs commonly in traumatic injury, causing deficits distal to the injury site. Conduits for repair currently on the market are hollow tubes; however, they often fail due to slow regeneration over long gaps. To facilitate increased regeneration speed and functional recovery, the ideal conduit should provide biochemically relevant signals and physical guidance cues, thus playing an active role in regeneration. To that end, laminin and laminin-polycaprolactone (PCL) blend nanofibers were fabricated to mimic peripheral nerve basement membrane. In vitro assays established 10% (wt) laminin content is sufficient to retain neurite-promoting effects of laminin. In addition, modified collector plate design to introduce an insulating gap enabled the fabrication of aligned nanofibers. The effects of laminin content and fiber orientation were evaluated in rat tibial nerve defect model. The lumens of conduits were filled with nanofiber meshes of varying laminin content and alignment to assess changes in motor and sensory recovery. Retrograde nerve conduction speed at 6 weeks was significantly faster in animals receiving aligned nanofiber conduits than in those receiving random nanofiber conduits. Animals receiving nanofiber-filled conduits showed some conduction in both anterograde and retrograde directions, whereas in animals receiving hollow conduits, no impulse conduction was detected. Aligned PCL nanofibers significantly improved motor function; aligned laminin blend nanofibers yielded the best sensory function recovery. In both cases, nanofiber-filled conduits resulted in better functional recovery than hollow conduits. These studies provide a firm foundation for the use of natural-synthetic blend electrospun nanofibers to enhance existing hollow nerve guidance conduits.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleGanglia, SpinalLamininMiceMotor ActivityNanofibersNerve RegenerationNeural ConductionPC12 CellsPolyestersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionBiocompatible MaterialsLamininpolycaprolactonePolyestersbiomimetic materialECMlamininnanotopographynerve regeneration

Identifiers

PMID22106069
PMCPMC3550006
OpenAlexW2069579154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.