ArticleDer Nervenarzt2012
[Ischemic stroke patients following intravenous thrombolysis. Outcome in a regional stroke center].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe wanted to compare the outcome following IV thrombolysis in our patients with ischemic stroke with the outcome reported from the phase 3 registration trials and other large trials. PATIENTS AND
methodsFrom January 2008 through December 2009 we treated 225 patients with ischemic stroke with IV thrombolysis. Retrospectively, we analyzed their clinical data upon admission, during their stay, and upon discharge with special reference to eligibility criteria for IV thrombolysis, symptomatic hemorrhage, and clinical outcome.
resultsThe average age of the patients was 74 years, with 34% being older than 80 years. The median time between stroke onset and initiation of treatment was 112 min. The initial median NIHSS was 11 points (Rankin score ≥ 4 in 79% of patients). The rate of symptomatic hemorrhage was 3%. The median follow-up was 14 days. At the end of the observation period, clinical symptoms had improved in 73% of patients (Rankin score ≤ 2 in 45% of patients). The mortality rate was 12%. In 55% of patients, IV thrombolysis was off label (age > 80 years in 34% of patients).
conclusionThe clinical results of IV thrombolysis in our stroke center are similar to the outcome reported from the registration trials and larger clinical series although we treated off label in more than half of the patients. Even larger studies have since shown that the age limit under 80 years for patients is not reasonable. The eligibility criteria should be adapted to reality at this point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22105884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.