SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2012
Current practice and future perspectives in the treatment of short bowel syndrome in children--a systematic review.
Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- An exploratory in vitro co-culture of enteric neurons and smooth muscle cells demonstrates neuronal contribution to muscle layer formation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Muscle hypertrophy and neuroplasticity in the small bowel in short bowel syndrome.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Article
- Simultaneous Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP) in Size Mismatch Small Bowel Transplantations.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Article
- Smooth muscle strips for intestinal tissue engineering.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeShort bowel syndrome (SBS) is a malabsorption disorder of the intestine, which leads to an inadequate alimentary supply. A number of therapeutic approaches are already in use, but research advances may provide new options in the future. The purpose of this paper was to provide an overview of the established therapeutic approaches together with a discussion of the future perspectives in the treatment of patients with SBS. We review those studies dealing with the treatment of SBS patients and discuss both surgical and non-surgical approaches together with tissue engineering.
methodsA systemic review of Medline-cited studies dealing with current practice and future perspectives in the treatment of short bowel in children was performed.
resultsSurgical approaches, non-surgical approaches, and tissue engineering which was used in the treatment of SBS were analyzed. Among the surgical approaches, the bowel lengthening procedures and small bowel transplantation are prevalent. Stimulants are most important concerning non-surgical approaches. Tissue engineering seems to be more experimental and was also evaluated.
conclusionThe treatment of SBS patients remains very complex. It is eminent to find the best therapeutic option for each patient and to individualize and modify the different possible types of applied techniques frequently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.