Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22105466›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2012

Is there any value to hepatitis B virus genotype analysis?

Sudeep Tanwar, Geoffrey Dusheiko

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Follow-Up of Newborns with Hepatitis B Antigenemia.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Screening and diagnosis of HBV in low-income and middle-income countries.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudeep TanwarCentre for Hepatology, University College London Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street Hampstead, London, NW3 2PF, UK. Sudeep.Tanwar@nhs.net
Geoffrey Dusheiko
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis B may cause a varying spectrum of diseases ranging from an asymptomatic or mild anicteric acute illness, to severe or fulminant hepatitis. Similarly, the outcome of chronic hepatitis B is variable. Viral factors associated with outcome of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection include hepatitis B e antigen status, HBV DNA, genotype, and HBV variants. HBV genotypes and subgenotypes have been associated with differences in clinical and virological characteristics, indicating that they may play a role in the virus-host relationship. A total of ten hepatitis B virus genotypes have been defined with a distinct geographical distribution. Hitherto, genotypes A, B, C and D have been studied most extensively. The HBV genotype appears to influence not only the natural history of HBV related liver disease but also the response to HBV treatment. HBV genotypes are also linked with both core promoter and BCP mutations. Progression to chronic infection appears to occur more frequently following acute infection with genotypes A and D than with the other studied genotypes. Genotypes A and B appear to have higher rates of spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion. More advanced liver disease and progression to HCC is more often seen in chronic infection with genotypes C and D in contrast to genotypes A and B. More specifically, genotypes A1, C, B2-B5 and H appear to be associated with more serious complications than genotypes A2, B1 and B6. These observations suggest important pathogenic differences between HBV genotypes. Genotypes A and B have higher response rates to interferon based therapy than genotypes C and D. Knowledge of HBV genotype enables clinicians to identify those patients at increased risk of disease progression whilst aiding the selection of appropriate antiviral therapy. Genotyping and monoclonal subtyping can provide useful information for epidemiological studies. In conclusion, genotyping of chronic HBV infections can help practicing physicians identify those at risk of disease progression and determine optimal anti-viral therapy.

Indexed as

GenotypeGenetic VariationHepatitis BHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B virusHumansPrognosisHepatitis B Surface Antigens

Identifiers

PMID22105466
OpenAlexW2027562056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.