ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2011
UV-B signaling in maize: transcriptomic and metabolomic studies at different irradiation times.
Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Metabolomics and Proteomics Analyses of the Grain-Filling Process and Differences in the Quality of Tibetan Hulless Barleys.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Odyssey of environmental and microbial interventions in maize crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Transcriptomic Profiling of Soybean in Response to High-Intensity UV-B Irradiation Reveals Stress Defense Signaling.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Plant transcriptomics and responses to environmental stress: an overview.Journal of genetics · 2015Review
- "Omics" of maize stress response for sustainable food production: opportunities and challenges.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2014Review
- Footprints of the sun: memory of UV and light stress in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants have evolved adaptations to environmental factors, including UV-B present in solar radiation. Deployment of specific adaptive phenotypes to avoid or repair UV-B damage requires physiological and developmental acclimation to variable UV-B fluence. To gain a better understanding of the events in UV-B acclimation, we have analyzed a 5min to 6h time course of transcriptome and metabolome responses in irradiated and shielded leaves and in immature maize ears to unravel the systemic physiological and developmental responses in exposed and shielded organs. Within 10 min of UV-B exposure, transcripts are changed not only in irradiated leaves, but also in shielded tissues. The number of UV-B-regulated transcripts rapidly increases with exposure length. Interestingly, after 10 min of exposure, the overlap in transcriptome changes in irradiated and shielded organs is significant; while, after 6h of UV-B, most transcripts are specific for each tissue under study. We suggest that early events in all tissues may be elicited by common signaling pathways, while at longer exposure times responses become more organ-specific. Our working hypothesis is that mobile signaling molecules are generated in irradiated organs to elicit the initial responses. We found several metabolites that rapidly change after different treatments during the timecourse; myoinositol is one candidate metabolite based on its rapid modulation in all organs. There is also support from RNA profiling: after 1h UV-B, transcripts for myoinositol-1-phosphate synthase are decreased in both irradiated and shielded leaves suggesting downregulation of biogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.