ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2011
[Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of lung neoplasms: a retrospective study of 329 cases].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrodes of radiofrequency ablation for malignant lung tumors: a narrative review of advances, applications, and prospects.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Advances in study of the sequence of lung tumor biopsy and thermal ablation.Thoracic cancer · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIn recent years, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been increasingly utilized as a non-surgical treatment option for patients with primary and metastatic lung tumors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and therapeutic effects of RFA among patients with pulmonary neoplasms.
methodsPatients with lung tumors treated with RFA from October 1999 to July 2006 in this hospital were enrolled into the study. A total of 329 cases, 237 primary lung tumors and 92 metastatic tumors, were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated for complications, local progression, and overall survival after one, two, and five years after RFA.
resultsThe complications of RFA with surgery included 63 (19.1%) patients with pneumothorax, 14 (4.2%) with hemoptysis (one death), 10 (3.0%) with hemothorax, 15 (4.5%) with pneumonia, and three (0.9%) with pericardial tamponade (one death). The mortality within 30 days was 0.6%. Needle tract tumors were observed in 6 patients (1.8%). The median time for progression was 21.6 months. The overall survival rates at one, two, and five years after RFA were 68.2%, 35.3% and 20.1%, respectively. Up to 78 (23.7%) patients with tumors that exceed 4 cm developed local progression, and a significant difference was found. No significant difference was found among patients with tumors less than 3 cm and among those with 3 cm-4 cm tumors.
conclusionRFA is a well-tolerated, reliable, and safe method for the treatment of lung malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.