Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22104077›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2012

The effects of anesthetic technique on cancer recurrence in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Renchun Lai, Zhenwei Peng, Dongtai Chen, Xudong Wang, Wei Xing, Weian Zeng, Minshan Chen

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02801409 (Effects of Epidural Anesthesia-analgesia on Long-term Survival in Patients After Lung Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02801409 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Epidural Anesthesia-analgesia on Long-term Survival in Patients After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2015 to 2019Enrolled400ConditionsLung Cancer, Thoracic Surgery, Anesthesia, Epidural, Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalArmsGeneral anesthesia alone, Combined epidural-general anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Anaesthetic techniques for risk of malignant tumour recurrence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renchun LaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenwei Peng
Dongtai Chen
Xudong Wang
Wei Xing
Weian Zeng
Minshan Chen
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrospective studies report that the benefit of regional anesthesia on cancer recurrence may depend on the specific tumor type. We compared the association between anesthetic technique and cancer recurrence in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with small HCC treated with RFA between August 1999 and December 2008. Patients receiving epidural anesthesia were compared with a group given general anesthesia. The end points were recurrence-free survival and overall survival, which were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier technique and compared using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and an alternative model with inverse probability weights to adjust for propensity score.

resultsThe hazard ratio for recurrence-free survival in the epidural anesthesia group compared with the general anesthesia group was 3.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-5.15; P < 0.001) in the Cox regression model and 4.31 (95% CI, 2.24-8.29; P < 0.001) in the analysis adjusted for propensity score with inverse probability weights. The hazard ratio for overall survival in the epidural anesthesia group compared with the general anesthesia group was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.50-1.18; P = 0.232) in the Cox regression model and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.81-1.97; P = 0.312) in the analysis adjusted for propensity score with inverse probability weights.

conclusionsThis retrospective analysis suggests that treatment of small HCC by RFA under general anesthesia is associated with reduced risk of cancer recurrence. No effect of anesthetic technique on overall survival is detected. Prospective, randomized trials to evaluate this association are warranted.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, GeneralCatheter AblationAdultAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularChinaChi-Square DistributionDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22104077
OpenAlexW2070314916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.