Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22104008›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2012

Evaluation of molecular modeling of agonist binding in light of the crystallographic structure of an agonist-bound A₂A adenosine receptor.

Francesca Deflorian, T Santhosh Kumar, Khai Phan, Zhan-Guo Gao, Fei Xu, Huixian Wu, Vsevolod Katritch, Raymond C Stevens, Kenneth A Jacobson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Crystal structures of the AIn silico pharmacology · 2013
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca DeflorianMolecular Recognition Section, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 8A, Room B1A-19, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0810, United States.
T Santhosh Kumar
Khai Phan
Zhan-Guo Gao
Fei Xu
Huixian Wu
Vsevolod Katritch
Raymond C Stevens
Kenneth A Jacobson
Scripps Research Institute · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Project 3U54GM094618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STEVENS, RAYMOND C · 2010 to 2014
$17.1M
Development Of Drugs Acting At Adenosine ReceptorsZIADK031117 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JACOBSON, KENNETH ALAN · 2009 to 2025
$10.4M
Computer Modeling of G Protein-Coupled ReceptorsZIADK031126 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JACOBSON, KENNETH ALAN · 2009 to 2025
$6.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK031117Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK031126NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular modeling of agonist binding to the human A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) was assessed and extended in light of crystallographic structures. Heterocyclic adenine nitrogens of cocrystallized agonist overlaid corresponding positions of the heterocyclic base of a bound triazolotriazine antagonist, and ribose moiety was coordinated in a hydrophilic region, as previously predicted based on modeling using the inactive receptor. Automatic agonist docking of 20 known potent nucleoside agonists to agonist-bound A(2A)AR crystallographic structures predicted new stabilizing protein interactions to provide a structural basis for previous empirical structure activity relationships consistent with previous mutagenesis results. We predicted binding of novel C2 terminal amino acid conjugates of A(2A)AR agonist CGS21680 and used these models to interpret effects on binding affinity of newly synthesized agonists. d-Amino acid conjugates were generally more potent than l-stereoisomers and free terminal carboxylates more potent than corresponding methyl esters. Amino acid moieties were coordinated close to extracellular loops 2 and 3. Thus, molecular modeling is useful in probing ligand recognition and rational design of GPCR-targeting compounds with specific pharmacological profiles.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAdenosineAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsAmino AcidsAnimalsBinding SitesCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusCrystallography, X-RayHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsNucleosidesPhenethylaminesProtein Conformation2-(4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino)-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosineAdenosineAdenosine A2 Receptor AgonistsAmino AcidsLigandsNucleosidesPhenethylaminesReceptor, Adenosine A2A

Identifiers

PMID22104008
PMCPMC3261785
OpenAlexW2098661743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.