Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22103856›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2011

A phylogeny and molecular barcodes for Caenorhabditis, with numerous new species from rotting fruits.

Karin C Kiontke, Marie-Anne Félix, Michael Ailion, Matthew V Rockman, Christian Braendle, Jean-Baptiste Pénigault, David H A Fitch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 234 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
234citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

234 citing papers in PubMed, 398 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. T2T genomes ofGenome research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Global genomic diversity of the selfing nematodebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. The bacteria of a fig community.Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. TheiScience · 2025
    Article
  17. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article

174 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karin C KiontkeDepartment of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East New York, New York 10003, USA. kk52@nyu.edu
Marie-Anne Félix
Michael Ailion
Matthew V Rockman
Christian Braendle
Jean-Baptiste Pénigault
David H A Fitch
New York University · USInstitut Jacques Monod · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Encyclopedia of C elegans 3'UTRS and their regulatory elementsU01HG004276 · NHGRI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PIANO, FABIO · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Discovery and Characterization of Quantitative Trait NucleotidesR01GM089972 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ROCKMAN, MATTHEW · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Regulation of Synaptic Transmission by GqK99MH082109 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI AILION, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2009
$226k
NHGRI NIH HHS 5U01HG004276-04NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089972NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH082109NIMH NIH HHS K99MH082109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a major laboratory model in biology. Only ten Caenorhabditis species were available in culture at the onset of this study. Many of them, like C. elegans, were mostly isolated from artificial compost heaps, and their more natural habitat was unknown.

resultsCaenorhabditis nematodes were found to be proliferating in rotten fruits, flowers and stems. By collecting a large worldwide set of such samples, 16 new Caenorhabditis species were discovered. We performed mating tests to establish biological species status and found some instances of semi-fertile or sterile hybrid progeny. We established barcodes for all species using ITS2 rDNA sequences. By obtaining sequence data for two rRNA and nine protein-coding genes, we determined the likely phylogenetic relationships among the 26 species in culture. The new species are part of two well-resolved sister clades that we call the Elegans super-group and the Drosophilae super-group. We further scored phenotypic characters such as reproductive mode, mating behavior and male tail morphology, and discuss their congruence with the phylogeny. A small space between rays 2 and 3 evolved once in the stem species of the Elegans super-group; a narrow fan and spiral copulation evolved once in the stem species of C. angaria, C. sp. 8 and C. sp. 12. Several other character changes occurred convergently. For example, hermaphroditism evolved three times independently in C. elegans, C. briggsae and C. sp. 11. Several species can co-occur in the same location or even the same fruit. At the global level, some species have a cosmopolitan distribution: C. briggsae is particularly widespread, while C. elegans and C. remanei are found mostly or exclusively in temperate regions, and C. brenneri and C. sp. 11 exclusively in tropical zones. Other species have limited distributions, for example C. sp. 5 appears to be restricted to China, C. sp. 7 to West Africa and C. sp. 8 to the Eastern United States.

conclusionsCaenorhabditis are "fruit worms", not soil nematodes. The 16 new species provide a resource and their phylogeny offers a framework for further studies into the evolution of genomic and phenotypic characters.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditisDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, HelminthDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFlowersFruitGenetic VariationHerbivoryPhylogenyPlantsDNA, HelminthDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID22103856
PMCPMC3277298
OpenAlexW1963690635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.