Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22103557›Full record

ReviewDevelopment, growth & differentiation2012

Developmentally programmed, RNA-directed genome rearrangement in Tetrahymena.

Kazufumi Mochizuki

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development, growth & differentiation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RNAi-dependentGenes & development · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Programmed DNA elimination in multicellular organisms.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazufumi MochizukiInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna, Austria. kazufumi.mochizuki@imba.oeaw.ac.at
Austrian Academy of Sciences · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 4307European Research Council 204986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmentally programmed genome rearrangement has been observed in a variety of eukaryotes from vertebrates to worms to protists, and it provides an interesting exception to the general rule of the constancy of the genome. DNA elimination in the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena is one of the most well-characterized programmed genome rearrangement events. DNA elimination in the newly formed macronucleus of Tetrahymena is epigenetically regulated by the DNA sequence of the parental macronucleus. Dicer-produced, Piwi-associated small RNAs mediate this epigenetic regulation, probably through a whole-genome comparison of the germline micronucleus to the somatic macronucleus. However, a correlation between small RNAs and programmed genome rearrangement could not be detected in the worm Ascaris suum. Therefore, different types of eukaryotes may have developed unique solutions to perform genome rearrangement.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalActive Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsAscaris suumDNAEpigenesis, GeneticGene RearrangementGenomeGenome, ProtozoanHeterochromatinMacronucleusMicronucleus, GermlineRNARNA InterferenceSequence Analysis, DNATetrahymenaDNAHeterochromatinRNATransposases

Identifiers

PMID22103557
PMCPMC3746296
OpenAlexW1949782126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.