Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22102885›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Novel SSR markers from BAC-end sequences, DArT arrays and a comprehensive genetic map with 1,291 marker loci for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Mahendar Thudi, Abhishek Bohra, Spurthi N Nayak, Nicy Varghese, Trushar M Shah, R Varma Penmetsa, Nepolean Thirunavukkarasu, Srivani Gudipati, Pooran M Gaur, Pawan L Kulwal and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Genome wide association study unveils the genetic basis of Orobanche crenata resistance in pea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chickpea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Mahendar ThudiGrain Legumes Research Program, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics-ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India.
Abhishek Bohra
Spurthi N Nayak
Nicy Varghese
Trushar M Shah
R Varma Penmetsa
Nepolean Thirunavukkarasu
Srivani Gudipati
Pooran M Gaur
Pawan L Kulwal
Hari D Upadhyaya
Polavarapu B Kavikishor
Peter Winter
Günter Kahl
Christopher D Town
Andrzej Kilian
Douglas R Cook
Rajeev K Varshney
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INOsmania University · INUniversity of California, Davis · USGenXPro (Germany) · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INJ. Craig Venter Institute · USMahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the third most important cool season food legume, cultivated in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. The goal of this study was to develop novel molecular markers such as microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers from bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-end sequences (BESs) and diversity arrays technology (DArT) markers, and to construct a high-density genetic map based on recombinant inbred line (RIL) population ICC 4958 (C. arietinum)×PI 489777 (C. reticulatum). A BAC-library comprising 55,680 clones was constructed and 46,270 BESs were generated. Mining of these BESs provided 6,845 SSRs, and primer pairs were designed for 1,344 SSRs. In parallel, DArT arrays with ca. 15,000 clones were developed, and 5,397 clones were found polymorphic among 94 genotypes tested. Screening of newly developed BES-SSR markers and DArT arrays on the parental genotypes of the RIL mapping population showed polymorphism with 253 BES-SSR markers and 675 DArT markers. Segregation data obtained for these polymorphic markers and 494 markers data compiled from published reports or collaborators were used for constructing the genetic map. As a result, a comprehensive genetic map comprising 1,291 markers on eight linkage groups (LGs) spanning a total of 845.56 cM distance was developed (http://cmap.icrisat.ac.in/cmap/sm/cp/thudi/). The number of markers per linkage group ranged from 68 (LG 8) to 218 (LG 3) with an average inter-marker distance of 0.65 cM. While the developed resource of molecular markers will be useful for genetic diversity, genetic mapping and molecular breeding applications, the comprehensive genetic map with integrated BES-SSR markers will facilitate its anchoring to the physical map (under construction) to accelerate map-based cloning of genes in chickpea and comparative genome evolution studies in legumes.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingQuantitative Trait LociChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, PlantCicerDNA, PlantGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, GeneticDNA, PlantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID22102885
PMCPMC3216927
OpenAlexW2140020874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.