Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22102826›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

Consequences of eukaryotic enhancer architecture for gene expression dynamics, development, and fitness.

Michael Z Ludwig, Manu, Ralf Kittler, Kevin P White, Martin Kreitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The power of the (imperfect) palindrome: Sequence-specific roles of palindromic motifs in gene regulation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Mutation in theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Multimodal transcriptional control of pattern formation in embryonic development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael Z LudwigDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America. mludwig@uchicago.edu
Manu
Ralf Kittler
Kevin P White
Martin Kreitman

Funding

CORE: ADMINISTRATIVEP50GM081892 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WHITE, KEVIN P. · 2008 to 2013
$15.9M
Evolution of Canalizing Mechanisms in Gene ExpressionR01GM078381 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KREITMAN, MARTIN E · 2007 to 2010
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM078381NIGMS NIH HHS 5P50GM081892NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081892NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulatory logic of time- and tissue-specific gene expression has mostly been dissected in the context of the smallest DNA fragments that, when isolated, recapitulate native expression in reporter assays. It is not known if the genomic sequences surrounding such fragments, often evolutionarily conserved, have any biological function or not. Using an enhancer of the even-skipped gene of Drosophila as a model, we investigate the functional significance of the genomic sequences surrounding empirically identified enhancers. A 480 bp long "minimal stripe element" is able to drive even-skipped expression in the second of seven stripes but is embedded in a larger region of 800 bp containing evolutionarily conserved binding sites for required transcription factors. To assess the overall fitness contribution made by these binding sites in the native genomic context, we employed a gene-replacement strategy in which whole-locus transgenes, capable of rescuing even-skipped(-) lethality to adulthood, were substituted for the native gene. The molecular phenotypes were characterized by tagging Even-skipped with a fluorescent protein and monitoring gene expression dynamics in living embryos. We used recombineering to excise the sequences surrounding the minimal enhancer and site-specific transgenesis to create co-isogenic strains differing only in their stripe 2 sequences. Remarkably, the flanking sequences were dispensable for viability, proving the sufficiency of the minimal element for biological function under normal conditions. These sequences are required for robustness to genetic and environmental perturbation instead. The mutant enhancers had measurable sex- and dose-dependent effects on viability. At the molecular level, the mutants showed a destabilization of stripe placement and improper activation of downstream genes. Finally, we demonstrate through live measurements that the peripheral sequences are required for temperature compensation. These results imply that seemingly redundant regulatory sequences beyond the minimal enhancer are necessary for robust gene expression and that "robustness" itself must be an evolved characteristic of the wild-type enhancer.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesBody PatterningDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, LethalGenetic FitnessHomeodomain ProteinsOrgan SpecificityTranscription FactorsTransgenesDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinseve protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain Proteinssr protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22102826
PMCPMC3213169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.