Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22102702›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2012

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are not associated with increased risk of thrombosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Sheila Weiss Smith, Masayo Sato, Steven D Gore, Maria R Baer, Xuehua Ke, Diane McNally, Amy Davidoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Ischemic stroke as the initial presentation in acute myeloid leukemia vs. myelodysplastic syndrome: a case report and literature review with pathophysiological and clinical exploration.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Thrombosis in Myeloid Malignancies: From CHIP to AML.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  5. Hematological Malignancies and Arterial Thromboembolism.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Treatment of low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Role of CrespSouth Asian journal of cancer
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sheila Weiss SmithCenter for Drug Safety, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, 220 Arch Street 12 Floor, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 21201. sweiss@rx.umaryland.edu.
Masayo Sato
Steven D Gore
Maria R Baer
Xuehua Ke
Diane McNally
Amy Davidoff
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Targeting Epigenomics in Myeloid NeoplasmsK24CA111717 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, STEVEN D · 2005 to 2015
$1.7M
Comparative Effectiveness: Erythropoietic Stimulating Agents in Treatment of MDSRC1CA145831 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DAVIDOFF, AMY J · 2009 to 2010
$774k
NCI NIH HHS 5RC1CA145831-2NCI NIH HHS K24 CA111717NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA145831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited reports of thrombosis among myelodysplastic syndrome patients exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agents. It is not clear whether erythropoiesis stimulating agents are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in myelodysplastic syndromes, as they are among patients with solid tumors. DESIGN AND

methodsThe association between use of erythropoiesis stimulating agent and transient thrombosis risk in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes was assessed in a case-crossover study nested within a cohort of incident myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Using the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database, cases with an incident diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis were identified. Using conditional logistical regression, the odds of exposure to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in the 12 weeks prior to the incident deep vein thrombosis (hazard period) was compared to the exposure odds in a prior 12-week comparison period.

resultsWithin the cohort of eligibles with myelodysplastic syndromes (n = 5,673) there were 212 incident cases of deep vein thrombosis events. Mean age was 76.2 (standard deviation = ± 8.6) years. Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents was not associated with deep vein thrombosis in the crude nor the adjusted models (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.60, 2.43). Central venous catheter placement (OR = 6.47, 95% CI: 2.37, 17.62) and red blood cell transfusion (OR = 4.60, 95% CI: 2.29, 9.23) were associated with deep vein thrombosis.

conclusionsDespite the link between use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents and thrombosis among patients with solid tumors, this study provides evidence that their safety profile may be different among patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesFemaleHematinicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSEER ProgramVenous ThrombosisHematinics

Identifiers

PMID22102702
PMCPMC3248926
OpenAlexW2057876801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.