Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22102647›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2011

Dystrophin quantification and clinical correlations in Becker muscular dystrophy: implications for clinical trials.

Karen Anthony, Sebahattin Cirak, Silvia Torelli, Giorgio Tasca, Lucy Feng, Virginia Arechavala-Gomeza, Annarita Armaroli, Michela Guglieri, Chiara S Straathof, Jan J Verschuuren and 9 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in neurology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Therapeutic opportunities and clinical outcome measures in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Developing antisense oligonucleotides for aMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Karen AnthonyThe Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Sebahattin Cirak
Silvia Torelli
Giorgio Tasca
Lucy Feng
Virginia Arechavala-Gomeza
Annarita Armaroli
Michela Guglieri
Chiara S Straathof
Jan J Verschuuren
Annemieke Aartsma-Rus
Paula Helderman-van den Enden
Katherine Bushby
Volker Straub
Caroline Sewry
Alessandra Ferlini
Enzo Ricci
Jennifer E Morgan
Francesco Muntoni
University College London · GBLeiden University · NLNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Ferrara · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is caused by mutations in the DMD gene that disrupt the open reading frame and prevent the full translation of its protein product, dystrophin. Restoration of the open reading frame and dystrophin production can be achieved by exon skipping using antisense oligonucleotides targeted to splicing elements. This approach aims to transform the Duchenne muscular dystrophy phenotype to that of the milder disorder, Becker muscular dystrophy, typically caused by in-frame dystrophin deletions that allow the production of an internally deleted but partially functional dystrophin. There is ongoing debate regarding the functional properties of the different internally deleted dystrophins produced by exon skipping for different mutations; more insight would be valuable to improve and better predict the outcome of exon skipping clinical trials. To this end, we have characterized the clinical phenotype of 17 patients with Becker muscular dystrophy harbouring in-frame deletions relevant to on-going or planned exon skipping clinical trials for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and correlated it to the levels of dystrophin, and dystrophin-associated protein expression. The cohort of 17 patients, selected exclusively on the basis of their genotype, included 4 asymptomatic, 12 mild and 1 severe patient. All patients had dystrophin levels of >40% of control and significantly higher dystrophin (P = 0.013), β-dystroglycan (P = 0.025) and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (P = 0.034) expression was observed in asymptomatic individuals versus symptomatic patients with Becker muscular dystrophy. Furthermore, grouping the patients by deletion, patients with Becker muscular dystrophy with deletions with an end-point of exon 51 (the skipping of which could rescue the largest group of Duchenne muscular dystrophy deletions) showed significantly higher dystrophin levels (P = 0.034) than those with deletions ending with exon 53. This is the first quantitative study on both dystrophin and dystrophin-associated protein expression in patients with Becker muscular dystrophy with deletions relevant for on-going exon skipping trials in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Taken together, our results indicate that all varieties of internally deleted dystrophin assessed in this study have the functional capability to provide a substantial clinical benefit to patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildCohort StudiesDystrophinExonsFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneOpen Reading FramesPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesDystrophin

Identifiers

PMID22102647
PMCPMC3235564
OpenAlexW1986390501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.