Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22102607›Full record

ReviewPediatric blood & cancer2012

Antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric hematology/oncology: new choices & new data.

Christopher C Dvorak, Brian T Fisher, Lillian Sung, William J Steinbach, Michael Nieder, Sarah Alexander, Theoklis E Zaoutis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Retrospective Analysis of Micafungin Prophylaxis in Children Under 12 Years Undergoing Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical practice update of antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Advances in the Treatment of Mycoses in Pediatric Patients.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Prevention of Infectious Complications in Patients With Chronic Granulomatous Disease.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2018
    Review
  18. Invasive Aspergillosis in Children: Update on Current Guidelines.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2018
    Review
  19. Recognition and Clinical Presentation of Invasive Fungal Disease in Neonates and Children.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher C DvorakDivision of Pediatric Blood & Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-1278, USA. dvorakc@peds.ucsf.edu
Brian T Fisher
Lillian Sung
William J Steinbach
Michael Nieder
Sarah Alexander
Theoklis E Zaoutis

Funding

COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
Community Clinical Oncology Program Research BaseU10CA095861 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI POLLOCK, BRAD H · 2002 to 2013
$19.5M
CIHRNCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA98543-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A severe complication of the treatment of pediatric cancers is the development of an invasive fungal infection (IFI). The data to support antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric oncology patients derive primarily from adult patients, and thus the optimal agent to utilize is not clear. Fluconazole has been a standard option, but agents with antimold activity are now available, each with limitations. Pediatric dosing for voriconazole and posaconazole is uncertain and multiple drug interactions exist. The echinocandins are well-tolerated, but only available in intravenous form. Ultimately, studies demonstrating biologic risk factors for the development of IFI may lead to personalized prophylactic strategies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntifungal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansInfantMaleMycosesRisk FactorsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID22102607
PMCPMC4008331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.