Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22101854›Full record

ArticleNature methods2011

Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers.

Teemu Kivioja, Anna Vähärautio, Kasper Karlsson, Martin Bonke, Martin Enge, Sten Linnarsson, Jussi Taipale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 563 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
563citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

563 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

503 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teemu KiviojaGenome-Scale Biology Program, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna Vähärautio
Kasper Karlsson
Martin Bonke
Martin Enge
Sten Linnarsson
Jussi Taipale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counting individual RNA or DNA molecules is difficult because they are hard to copy quantitatively for detection. To overcome this limitation, we applied unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), which make each molecule in a population distinct, to genome-scale human karyotyping and mRNA sequencing in Drosophila melanogaster. Use of this method can improve accuracy of almost any next-generation sequencing method, including chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing, genome assembly, diagnostics and manufacturing-process control and monitoring.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDown SyndromeDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene LibraryGenomicsHumansKaryotypingMaleRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNARNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22101854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.