ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2011
Partitioning standard base excess: a new approach.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in acid-base and ion balance during exercise in normoxia and normobaric hypoxia.European journal of applied physiology · 2017Trial
- A head to head evaluation of 8 biochemical scanning tools for unmeasured ions.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2017Trial
- Unveiling the Gaps: Machine Learning Models for Unmeasured Ions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Understanding base excess (BE): merits and pitfalls.Intensive care medicine · 2022Article
- Metabolic Acidosis in Critically Ill Cirrhotic Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2019Article
- Comprehensive diagnosis of whole-body acid-base and fluid-electrolyte disorders using a mathematical model and whole-body base excess.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
'Standard' or 'extracellular' base excess (SBE) is a modified calculation using one-third the normal hemoglobin concentration. It is a 'CO(2)-invariant' expression of meta- bolic acid-base status integrated across interstitial, plasma and erythrocytic compartments (IPE). SBE also integrates conflicting physical chemical influences on metabolic acid-base status. Until recently attempts to quantify individual contributions to SBE, for example the plasma strong ion gap, failed to span the 'CO(2-)stable' IPE dimension. The first breakthrough was from Anstey, who determined the con- centration of unmeasured charged species referenced to the IPE domain using Wooten's physical chemical version of the Van Slyke equation. In this issue Drs Wolf and DeLand present a diagnostic tool based on an IPE model which dissects a version of SBE (BEnet) into nine independent (BEind) components, all referenced to the IPE domain. The reported components are excess/deficits of free water, chlo- ride, albumin, unmeasured ions, sodium, potassium, lactate, 'Ca-Mg' (a composite divalent cation entity), and phosphate. The model also reports individualised volumes of plasma, erythrocytes and interstitial fluid. The tool is an original contribution, but there are concerns. The impact of assum- ing fixed relationships between arterial and venous acid-base and saturation values in sepsis, anaemia and in differing shock states is unclear. Clinicians are also unlikely to accept that unique, accurate IPE volume determinations can be derived from a single set of blood gas and biochemistry results. Nevertheless, volume determinations aside, the tool is likely to become a valuable addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.