Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22101337›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2011

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition enhances p53-dependent and -independent DNA damage responses induced by DNA damaging agent.

Diana Nguyen, Maria Zajac-Kaye, Larry Rubinstein, Donna Voeller, Joseph E Tomaszewski, Shivaani Kummar, Alice P Chen, Yves Pommier, James H Doroshow, Sherry X Yang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Landscape of Pancreatic Cancer Therapeutic Resistance Mechanisms.International journal of biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Putting the brakes on p53-driven apoptosis.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana NguyenDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Maria Zajac-Kaye
Larry Rubinstein
Donna Voeller
Joseph E Tomaszewski
Shivaani Kummar
Alice P Chen
Yves Pommier
James H Doroshow
Sherry X Yang
National Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · USResearch Institute of Health Sciences · ESUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

DNA Repair, Cell Cycle Checkpoints and Apoptosis as Targets for Anticancer DrugsZIABC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 2009 to 2025
$23.0M
Phase 01 Clinical TrialsZIABC011078 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DOROSHOW, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$9.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting DNA repair with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has shown a broad range of anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced malignancies with and without BRCA deficiency. It remains unclear what role p53 plays in response to PARP inhibition in BRCA-proficient cancer cells treated with DNA damaging agents. Using gene expression microarray analysis, we find that DNA damage response (DDR) pathways elicited by veliparib (ABT-888), a PARP inhibitor, plus topotecan comprise the G1/S checkpoint, ATM, and p53 signaling pathways in p53-wildtype cancer cell lines and BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATR pathway in p53-mutant lines. In contrast, topotecan alone induces the G1/S checkpoint pathway in p53-wildtype lines and not in p53-mutant cells. These responses are coupled with G2/G1 checkpoint effectors p21(CDKN1A) upregulation, and Chk1 and Chk2 activation. The drug combination enhances G2 cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and a marked increase in cell death relative to topotecan alone in p53-wildtype and p53-mutant or -null cells. We also show that the checkpoint kinase inhibitor UCN-01 abolishes the G2 arrest induced by the veliparib and topotecan combination and further increases cell death in both p53-wildtype and -mutant cells. Collectively, PARP inhibition by veliparib enhances DDR and cell death in BRCA-proficient cancer cells in a p53-dependent and -independent fashion. Abrogating the cell-cycle arrest induced by PARP inhibition plus chemotherapeutics may be a strategy in the treatment of BRCA-proficient cancer.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzimidazolesCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DeathCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21HCT116 CellsHT29 CellsHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesSignal TransductionStaurosporineTime Factors7-hydroxystaurosporineBenzimidazolesCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesStaurosporineTopotecanTumor Suppressor Protein p53veliparib

Identifiers

PMID22101337
PMCPMC3272289
OpenAlexW2086824644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.