Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22101199›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2012

Validation of pretransplantation assessment of mortality risk score in the outcome of hematopoietic SCT in non-Caucasians.

Y Mori, T Teshima, K Kamezaki, K Kato, K Takenaka, H Iwasaki, T Miyamoto, K Nagafuji, T Eto, K Akashi

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reevaluation of the pretransplant assessment of mortality score after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2015
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y MoriDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
T Teshima
K Kamezaki
K Kato
K Takenaka
H Iwasaki
T Miyamoto
K Nagafuji
T Eto
K Akashi
Kyushu University · JPHamanomachi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pretransplantation Assessment of Mortality (PAM) score is a risk score for mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Ethnicity is a genetically determined factor that correlated with immune-mediated outcomes of allogeneic HSCT. We evaluated the predictive value of the PAM score for transplant outcome in 276 Japanese populations in which transplant-related complications occur less frequently than Caucasians. The PAM score effectively risk-stratified these patients for survival; overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 100%, 80.2%, 49.4%, and 13.9% in the categories 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, showing a clear distinction of OS by categories (P<0.001). In addition, the PAM score is useful for the prediction of transplant outcomes both in patients with standard-risk underlying diseases and those with high-risk diseases. The PAM score developed in Caucasian populations is thus useful in non-Caucasian populations.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleAdolescentAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurvival RateTime FactorsTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID22101199
OpenAlexW2047333894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.