Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22100890›Full record

ArticleVaccine2012

Measurement of antibody responses to Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) and Dryvax(®) using proteome microarrays and development of recombinant protein ELISAs.

Gary Hermanson, Sookhee Chun, Jiin Felgner, Xiaolin Tan, Jozelyn Pablo, Rie Nakajima-Sasaki, Douglas M Molina, Philip L Felgner, Xiaowu Liang, D Huw Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. IMVAMUNEVaccines · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gary HermansonAntigen Discovery Inc., Irvine, CA 92618, United States.
Sookhee Chun
Jiin Felgner
Xiaolin Tan
Jozelyn Pablo
Rie Nakajima-Sasaki
Douglas M Molina
Philip L Felgner
Xiaowu Liang
D Huw Davies
Antigen Discovery (United States) · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
CLINICAL &REGULATORY AFFAIRS SUPPORT CONTRACTN01AI005413 · NIAID · FISHER BIOSERVICES, INC. · PI BEARDSLEY, DENNIS · 2000 to 2000
$7.7M
Seriodiagnostic arrays for biodefense and emerging infectious diseasesR44AI058365 · NIAID · IMMPORT THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI DAVIES, DAVID HUW · 2008 to 2010
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI005413NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040097NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-40097NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI058365NIAID NIH HHS R44-AI-58365NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is an attenuated strain of vaccinia virus that is being considered as a safer alternative to replicating vaccinia vaccine strains such as Dryvax(®) and ACAM2000. Its excellent safety profile and large genome also make it an attractive vector for the delivery of heterologous genes from other pathogens. MVA was attenuated by prolonged passage through chick embryonic fibroblasts in vitro. In human and most mammalian cells, production of infectious progeny is aborted in the late stage of infection. Despite this, MVA provides high-level gene expression and is immunogenic in humans and other animals. A key issue for vaccine developers is the ability to be able to monitor an immune response to MVA in both vaccinia naïve and previously vaccinated individuals. To this end we have used antibody profiling by proteome microarray to compare profiles before and after MVA and Dryvax vaccination to identify candidate serodiagnostic antigens. Six antigens with diagnostic utility, comprising three membrane and three non-membrane proteins from the intracellular mature virion, were purified and evaluated in ELISAs. The membrane protein WR113/D8L provided the best sensitivity and specificity of the six antigens tested for monitoring both MVA and Dryvax vaccination, whereas the A-type inclusion protein homolog, WR148, provided the best discrimination. The ratio of responses to membrane protein WR132/A13L and core protein WR070/I1L also provided good discrimination between primary and secondary responses to Dryvax, whereas membrane protein WR101/H3L and virion assembly protein WR118/D13L together provided the best sensitivity for detecting antibody in previously vaccinated individuals. These data will aid the development novel MVA-based vaccines.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralAntibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansProtein Array AnalysisRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificitySmallpox VaccineVaccinia virusAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralDryVax vaccineRecombinant ProteinsSmallpox Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID22100890
PMCPMC3246096
OpenAlexW1996257646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.