Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22100770›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2012

A tale of two itches. Common features and notable differences in brain activation evoked by cowhage and histamine induced itch.

Alexandru D P Papoiu, Robert C Coghill, Robert A Kraft, Hui Wang, Gil Yosipovitch

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03096444 (Antipruritic Effect of Topical Ketamine, Amitriptyline, and Lidocaine), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03096444 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Antipruritic Effect of Topical Ketamine, Amitriptyline, and Lidocaine

TypeinterventionalSponsorGil YosipovitchRan2017 to 2017Enrolled13ConditionsPruritusArmsKetamine Hydrochloride, Amitriptyline Hydrochloride, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Ketamine hydrochloride, Amitriptyline hydrochloride, and Lidocaine hydrochloride, Lipoderm Cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The brain circuitry mediating antipruritic effects of acupuncture.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2014
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Supraspinal Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Itch Processing.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cell Type-Specific Modulation of Acute Itch Processing in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandru D P PapoiuDepartment of Dermatology, Wake Forest University & Virginia Polytechnic Institute Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Robert C Coghill
Robert A Kraft
Hui Wang
Gil Yosipovitch
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Skin-Brain Mechanisms of Pruritus in Health and DiseaseR01AR055902 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI YOSIPOVITCH, GIL · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS 5R01AR055902NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous PET and fMRI brain imaging studies targeting neural networks processing itch sensation have used histamine as the sole itch inducer. In contrast with histamine, cowhage-induced itch is mediated via proteinase activated receptors PAR2 and is transmitted through a separate spinothalamic pathway, therefore imaging the brain activation evoked by cowhage could provide further insight into central processing of itch. We report for the first time a functional MRI Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) study of neuronal processing of itch induced by cowhage, analyzed in contrast with histamine-induced itch. We also explored the brain responses induced by histamine and cowhage combined in a tight sequence. The results of our analyses obtained in a group of 15 healthy volunteers suggested that cowhage and histamine co-activated a core group of brain structures, while also revealing notable differences. Core areas activated by both stimuli were found in the thalamus, primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, posterior parietal cortex, superior and middle temporal cortices, PCC, ACC, precuneus and cuneus. Cowhage induced a notably distinct and more extensive involvement of the insular cortex, claustrum, basal ganglia, putamen, thalamic nuclei and pulvinar. The differences observed between these two itch modalities were investigated to determine the impact of quantitative versus qualitative factors, and correlations between itch intensity and the patterns in brain activation were explored. Our analysis revealed that the most significant differences between cowhage and histamine itch were not affected by stimulus intensity, although a subset of regions displayed activations which were intensity-dependent. The combined application of cowhage and histamine highlighted the role of insula and claustrum in the processing of both itch modalities in the same time. The present results suggest the existence of overlapping but also distinct neuronal networks processing these two different types of itch.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHistamineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMucunaPruritusYoung AdultHistamine

Identifiers

PMID22100770
PMCPMC3288667
OpenAlexW1980092933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.