Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22100530›Full record

ArticleJournal of sport rehabilitation2012

Dynamic-position-sense impairment's independence of perceived knee function in women with ACL reconstruction.

Andrew E Littmann, Masaki Iguchi, Sangeetha Madhavan, Jamie L Kolarik, Richard K Shields

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sport rehabilitation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. INFLUENCE OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION ON DYNAMIC POSTURAL CONTROL.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamic knee stability and ballistic knee movement after ACL reconstruction: an application on instep soccer kick.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew E LittmannDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Masaki Iguchi
Sangeetha Madhavan
Jamie L Kolarik
Richard K Shields

Funding

Novel Intervention to Influence Muscle Plasticity in Veterans with SCII01RX000149 · VA · IOWA CITY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHIELDS, RICHARD K. · 2012 to 2014
–
RRD VA I01 RX000149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThere is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding whether women with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) demonstrate impaired proprioception. This study examined dynamic-position-sense accuracy and central-nervous-system (CNS) processing time between those with and without long-term ACLR.

objectiveTo compare proprioception of knee movement in women with ACLR and healthy controls.

designCross-sectional.

settingHuman neuromuscular performance laboratory.

participants11 women (age 22.64 ± 2.4 y) with ACLR (1.6-5.8 y postsurgery) and 20 women without (age 24.05 ± 1.4 y).

interventionsThe authors evaluated subjects using 3 methods to assess position sense. During knee flexion at pseudorandomly selected speeds (40°, 60°, 80°, 90°, and 100°/s), subjects indicated with their index finger when their knee reached a predetermined target angle (50°). Accuracy was calculated as an error score. CNS processing time was computed using the time to detect movement and the minimum time of angle indication. Passive and active joint-position sense were also determined at a slow velocity (3°/s) from various knee-joint starting angles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Absolute and constant error of target angle, indication accuracy, CNS processing time, and perceived function.

resultsBoth subject groups showed similar levels of error during dynamic-position-sense testing, despite continued differences in perceived knee function. Estimated CNS processing time was 260 ms for both groups. Joint-position sense during slow active or passive movement did not differ between cohorts.

conclusionsControl and ACLR subjects demonstrated similar dynamic, passive, and active joint-position-sense error and CNS processing speed even though ACLR subjects reported greater impairment of function. The impairment of proprioception is independent of post-ACLR perception of function.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKneeMuscle, SkeletalProprioceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22100530
PMCPMC5573870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.