Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22099611›Full record

ReviewEuropean urology2012

Biomarkers in the management and treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Andrew J Armstrong, Mario A Eisenberger, Susan Halabi, Stephane Oudard, David M Nanus, Daniel P Petrylak, A Oliver Sartor, Howard I Scher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. A Framework for Autonomous AI-Driven Drug Discovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Precision oncology: transforming cancer care through personalized medicine.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  13. Microtubule regulation in cancer cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Flare phenomenon visualized byAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Superscan onArchive of clinical cases · 2023
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew J ArmstrongDuke Cancer Institute and the Duke Prostate Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA. andrew.armstrong@duke.edu
Mario A Eisenberger
Susan Halabi
Stephane Oudard
David M Nanus
Daniel P Petrylak
A Oliver Sartor
Howard I Scher

Funding

SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Yu Chen, MICHAEL J MORRIS · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629NCI NIH HHS P50 CA92629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextWe have recently witnessed a rapid increase in the number of effective systemic agents for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), including novel hormonal therapies (abiraterone acetate and MDV3100), immunotherapies (sipuleucel-T), chemotherapies (cabazitaxel), and bone microenvironment targeting agents (denosumab, radium 223). Given the increasing complexity of treatment decisions for this disease, major research and clinical priorities are (1) finding biomarkers that enable an understanding of the natural history and complex biology of this heterogeneous malignancy, (2) defining predictive biomarkers that identify men most likely to benefit from a given therapy, and (3) identifying biomarkers of early response or progression to optimize outcomes.

objectiveIn this review, we discuss existing and potential biomarkers in CRPC and how they may currently inform prognosis, aid in treatment selection (predictive value), and relate to survival outcomes (surrogacy). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed-based literature searches and abstracts through September 2011 provided the basis for this literature review as well as expert opinion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We address blood and urine-based biomarkers such as prostate-specific antigen, lactate dehydrogenase, total and bone alkaline phosphatase and other bone turnover markers, hemoglobin, and circulating tumor cells in the context of prognosis, prediction, and patient selection for therapy. Given the inherent problems associated with defining progression-free survival in CRPC, the importance of biomarker development and the needed steps are highlighted. We place the discussion of biomarkers within the context of the design/intent of a trial and mechanism of action of a given systemic therapy. We discuss novel biomarker development and the pathway for surrogate or predictive biomarkers to become credentialed as useful tests that inform therapeutic decisions.

conclusionsA greater understanding of biomarkers in CRPC permits a more personalized approach to care that maximizes benefit and minimizes harm and can inform clinical trials tailored to men most likely to derive benefit.

Indexed as

OrchiectomyAnemiaAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsCarcinomaDisease-Free SurvivalHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsTissue ExtractsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorL-Lactate DehydrogenaseProstate-Specific Antigensipuleucel-TTissue Extracts

Identifiers

PMID22099611
PMCPMC3445625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.