Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22098737›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

GluN1-specific redox effects on the kinetic mechanism of NMDA receptor activation.

Iehab Talukder, Rashek Kazi, Lonnie P Wollmuth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural insights into NMDA receptor pharmacology.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. NMDA Receptors in the Central Nervous System.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Asynchronous movements prior to pore opening in NMDA receptors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iehab TalukderGraduate Program in Neuroscience, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Rashek Kazi
Lonnie P Wollmuth
Stony Brook University · USState University of New York · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008444 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FROHMAN, MICHAEL A. · 1992 to 2024
$12.6M
Functional Architecture of Glutamate Receptor ChannelsR01MH066892 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI WOLLMUTH, LONNIE P · 2003 to 2012
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008444NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDA receptors are glutamate-activated ion channel complexes central to the functioning of the mammalian nervous system. Opening of the NMDA receptor ion channel pore is initiated by agonist-induced conformational changes in the extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) but the dynamic mechanism of this process remains unresolved. We studied how a disulfide bond in the obligatory GluN1 subunit-the sole site of redox modulation in NMDA receptors-controls this activation gating mechanism. This disulfide bond is located in the hinge region of the LBD, and presumably constrains agonist-induced cleft closure of the clamshell-like LBD. Elimination of this bond, by either DTT-mediated reduction or mutagenesis, enhances gating efficiency such that pore opening now occurs with higher frequency and longer duration. The most prominent effect was to shift opening modes to long duration openings reminiscent of a high P(o) gating mode that the NMDA receptor exhibits under ambient oxidizing conditions. In terms of preopen gating steps, elimination of this bond has effects only on the fast gating step consistent with this step being GluN1-specific and reflecting GluN1 gating movements immediately before channel opening. Overall, our results suggest that the dynamics of the GluN1 LBD have strong effects on late pore opening steps including regulating the duration of pore opening. This redox-mediated gating modulation could be an underlying mechanism of NMDA receptor malfunction in redox-dependent disease states and presents a potential target of pharmacologic action.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAnimalsCysteineDisulfidesDithiothreitolKineticsLigandsOxidation-ReductionProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein SubunitsRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTime FactorsXenopusCysteineDisulfidesDithiothreitolLigandsProtein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID22098737
PMCPMC3218337
OpenAlexW2012499074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.