Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22097965›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology2012

Toxicological considerations when creating nanoparticle-based drugs and drug delivery systems.

Arati Sharma, SubbaRao V Madhunapantula, Gavin P Robertson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Materials today. Bio · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arati SharmaThe Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, R130, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
SubbaRao V Madhunapantula
Gavin P Robertson

Funding

Targeted Chemoprevention for MelanomaR01CA136667 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ROBERTSON, GAVIN P. · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
Akt3 Signaling as a Therapeutic TargetR01CA127892 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ROBERTSON, GAVIN P. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Synergistically Acting Targeted Therapeutics for MelanomaR01CA138634 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ROBERTSON, GAVIN P. · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Chemopreventive Efficacy of Plumbagin in MelanomaR03CA142060 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SHARMA, ARATI · 2009 to 2010
$155k
NCI NIH HHS CA-1138634-02NCI NIH HHS CA-136667-02NCI NIH HHS CA-142060-02NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127892NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136667NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138634NCI NIH HHS R03 CA142060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe biggest challenge faced by the scientific community involved in drug development is to deliver safe and effective dosage of drugs without causing systemic toxicity. Therefore, novel nano-based delivery vehicles specifically targeting tumors but not normal tissues are urgently needed. AREAS COVERED: Nanoparticles have beneficial aspects but can be toxic themselves, which is always a concern for any drug or delivery agent. This review examines and details the toxicological aspects that should be considered when planning to use nanoparticles in animals or in man for drug delivery or imaging. Subjects discussed in this review include i) overviews of applications of various nanoparticles for drug delivery and imaging; ii) toxicological aspects to consider when selecting particular nanoparticles for use in various applications in animals or man; iii) hurdles faced when examining nanoparticle toxicity; and iv) current approaches for assessing nanoparticle toxicity. EXPERT OPINION: Nanotechnology has significant potential for advancing therapeutic efficacy and imaging in cancer; however, these agents can be toxic. Therefore, toxicity needs to be considered when selecting nanoparticles for a particular application. Methods for assessing nanoparticle toxicity need to be improved and standardized across all nanotechnology platforms in order to speed up the application of nanoparticle use in humans.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAnimalsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesNanotechnologyNeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug CarriersPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID22097965
PMCPMC3245366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.