Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22095631›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2012

Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures.

Matthew Austin, Yu-Ching Yang, Eric Vittinghoff, Silvano Adami, Steven Boonen, Douglas C Bauer, Gerolamo Bianchi, Michael A Bolognese, Claus Christiansen, Richard Eastell and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00089791 (A Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis FREEDOM), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00089791 phase3completednot on this map

A Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis FREEDOM (Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2004 to 2008Enrolled7,808ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsplacebo, Denosumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Denosumab significantly increases bone mineral density and reduces bone turnover compared with monthly oral ibandronate and risedronate in postmenopausal women who remained at higher risk for fracture despite previous suboptimal treatment with an oral bisphosphonate.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Guideline
  8. Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment goals with denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. 3D-modeling from hip DXA shows improved bone structure with romosozumab followed by denosumab or alendronate.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. A single dose of zoledronate preserves bone mineral density for up to 2 years after a second course of romosozumab.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T-Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  15. Effect of denosumab on trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Treatment responses with once-weekly teriparatide therapy for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. The effect of 8 or 5 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM Extension study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  20. Further reductions in nonvertebral fracture rate with long-term denosumab treatment in the FREEDOM open-label extension and influence of hip bone mineral density after 3 years.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Matthew AustinAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA. maustin@amgen.com
Yu-Ching Yang
Eric Vittinghoff
Silvano Adami
Steven Boonen
Douglas C Bauer
Gerolamo Bianchi
Michael A Bolognese
Claus Christiansen
Richard Eastell
Andreas Grauer
Federico Hawkins
David L Kendler
Beatriz Oliveri
Michael R McClung
Ian R Reid
Ethel S Siris
Jose Zanchetta
Cristiano A F Zerbini
Cesar Libanati
Steven R Cummings
FREEDOM Trial
Amgen (United States) · USBone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation · USCenter for Clinical & Basic Research · DKCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESKU Leuven · BEUniversidad de Buenos Aires · ARUniversidad del Salvador · ARUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density (DXA BMD) is a strong predictor of fracture risk in untreated patients. However, previous patient-level studies suggest that BMD changes explain little of the fracture risk reduction observed with osteoporosis treatment. We investigated the relevance of DXA BMD changes as a predictor for fracture risk reduction using data from the FREEDOM trial, which randomly assigned placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months to 7808 women aged 60 to 90 years with a spine or total hip BMD T-score < -2.5 and not < -4.0. We took a standard approach to estimate the percent of treatment effect explained using percent changes in BMD at a single visit (months 12, 24, or 36). We also applied a novel approach using estimated percent changes in BMD from baseline at the time of fracture occurrence (time-dependent models). Denosumab significantly increased total hip BMD by 3.2%, 4.4%, and 5.0% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Denosumab decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures by 68% (p < 0.0001) and nonvertebral fracture by 20% (p = 0.01) over 36 months. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a considerable proportion of the effect of denosumab in reducing new or worsening vertebral fracture risk (35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20%-61%] and 51% [95% CI: 39%-66%] accounted for by percent change at month 36 and change in time-dependent BMD, respectively) and explained a considerable amount of the reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk (87% [95% CI: 35% - >100%] and 72% [95% CI: 24% - >100%], respectively). Previous patient-level studies may have underestimated the strength of the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk or this relationship may be unique to denosumab.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMiddle AgedPlacebosRisk Reduction BehaviorSpinal FracturesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID22095631
PMCPMC3415619
OpenAlexW2104372323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.