ArticleLa Radiologia medica2012
Sonography of the small bowel after oral administration of fluid: an assessment of the diagnostic value of the technique.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abdominal ultrasonography of the pediatric gastrointestinal tract.World journal of radiology · 2016Review
- Ultrasound of selected pathologies of the small intestine.Journal of ultrasonography · 2013Article
- Transabdominal ultrasonography of the small bowel.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study was performed to assess the feasibility and possible advantages of bowel sonography after fluid filling of intestinal loops compared with conventional sonography. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-five consecutive patients with known or suspected coeliac disease (35 females, ten males; age range 11-65 years) prospectively underwent sonography before and after ingestion of 750 ml of an aqueous solution of polyethylene glycol. Results before and after fluid distension were compared to assess whether luminal filling improved small-bowel visualisation.
resultsLuminal filling improved visualisation of intestinal features (luminal diameter, mucosal folds, parietal layers) in 77.6% of cases (marked, moderate or mild improvement in 2, 16 and 17 patients; 4.4%, 35.5% and 37.7%), respectively, and showed no change or worsening in 20% and 2.2% nine and one patient), respectively. Baseline examination showed abnormal features in 13/25 celiac patients (dilated fluid-filled loops, increased peristalsis, transient intussusception, mesenteric lymph nodes, intraperitoneal fluid). Reexamination after luminal filling showed additional abnormalities in six of the previous 13 and in three further coeliac patients. There were no false positive signs due to fluid administration.
conclusionsLuminal filling can improve visualisation of bowel walls and fold pattern and may be helpful in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.