ReviewInternational orthopaedics2012
Thromboprophylaxis in patients older than 75 years or with moderate renal impairment undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery [corrected].
Review in International orthopaedics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticoagulant for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism patients with renal dysfunction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement: systematic review, meta-analysis, and indirect treatment comparisons.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Pooled it
- Comparison of low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, and their combination for the prevention of thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty in obese patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant for treatment and prophylaxis of VTE patients with renal insufficiency: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Thrombosis journal · 2024Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin versus New Oral Anticoagulants to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Length of hospitalization and mortality for bleeding during treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban.PloS one · 2018Article
- Anticoagulation therapy and proximal femoral fracture treatment: An update.EFORT open reviews · 2016Article
- New oral pharmacotherapeutic agents for venous thromboprophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty.World journal of orthopedics · 2014Review
- The necessity of pharmacological prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in major joint arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2014Article
- Antithrombotic prophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery: an historical overview and update of current recommendations.International orthopaedics · 2014Review
- The discovery of dabigatran etexilate.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2013Article
- Review
- Type of anaesthesia and the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or dabigatran etexilate in major orthopaedic surgery: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials.Thrombosis journal · 2012Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProspective, double-blind studies in orthopaedic patients have been conducted using the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (hereafter referred to as dabigatran), with two doses investigated and approved for adults (220 mg and 150 mg once daily) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). The European Medicines Agency decided that in major joint orthopaedic surgery, the lower dose should be used in elderly patients (aged over 75 years) and those with reduced renal function (creatinine clearance between 30 and 50 ml/min). Our objective was to understand the efficacy and bleeding data for the lower dose in this subpopulation.
methodsWe extracted and analysed data from the elderly or from moderately renally impaired patients (n 632 of = 5,539) from the orthopaedic clinical development programme of dabigatran.
resultsDabigatran 150 mg once daily was as effective as the standard European enoxaparin regimen, with numerically fewer major bleeding events. Rates of major VTE were 4.3% vs 6.4% of patients, respectively. Major bleeding events occurred in four (1.3%) vs 11 (3.3%), which shows a trend towards lower bleeding with dabigatran 150 mg [odds ratio (OR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-1.25; p = 0.110]. Mean volume of blood loss was 395 vs 417 ml, and transfused units were 2.4 vs 2.5, respectively. Other safety parameters, including the incidence of wound infections and complications, were similar for 150 mg once daily dabigatran and enoxaparin.
conclusionFor patients at higher risk of bleeding, dabigatran 150 mg once daily is as effective as enoxaparin following major orthopaedic surgery and is associated with a favourable bleeding rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.