Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22095081›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

Frameshift mutagenesis: the roles of primer-template misalignment and the nonhomologous end-joining pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Kevin Lehner, Sarah V Mudrak, Brenda K Minesinger, Sue Jinks-Robertson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Trapped topoisomerase II initiates formation of de novo duplications via the nonhomologous end-joining pathway in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin LehnerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Sarah V Mudrak
Brenda K Minesinger
Sue Jinks-Robertson
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USEmory University · US

Funding

Genetics Training Grant-Year 26T32GM007754 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAASE, STEVEN B · 1985 to 2019
$8.3M
REGULATION OF MITOTIC RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM038464 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1992 to 2015
$3.6M
RECOMBINATION BETWEEN REPEATED SEQUENCE IN YEASTR29GM038464 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINKS-ROBERTSON, SUE · 1987 to 1991
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM038464NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038464NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small insertions or deletions that alter the reading frame of a gene typically occur in simple repeats such as mononucleotide runs and are thought to reflect spontaneous primer-template misalignment during DNA replication. The resulting extrahelical repeat is efficiently recognized by the mismatch repair machinery, which specifically replaces the newly replicated strand to restore the original sequence. Frameshift mutagenesis is most easily studied using reversion assays, and previous studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggested that the length threshold for polymerase slippage in mononucleotide runs is 4N. Because the probability of slippage is strongly correlated with run length, however, it was not clear whether shorter runs were unable to support slippage or whether the resulting frameshifts were obscured by the presence of longer runs. To address this issue, we removed all mononucleotide runs >3N from the yeast lys2ΔBgl and lys2ΔA746 frameshift reversion assays, which detect net 1-bp deletions and insertions, respectively. Analyses demonstrate that 2N and 3N runs can support primer-template misalignment, but there is striking run-specific variation in the frequency of slippage, in the accumulation of +1 vs. -1 frameshifts and in the apparent efficiency of mismatch repair. We suggest that some of this variation reflects the role of flanking sequence in initiating primer-template misalignment and that some reflects replication-independent frameshifts generated by the nonhomologous end-joining pathway. Finally, we demonstrate that nonhomologous end joining is uniquely required for the de novo creation of tandem duplications from noniterated sequence.

Indexed as

Frameshift MutationMutagenesisAllelesBase Pair MismatchBase SequenceDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Mismatch RepairDNA ReplicationGene DuplicationMolecular Sequence DataRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22095081
PMCPMC3276632
OpenAlexW2054879948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.