Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22094950›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2011

Error prevention and mitigation as forces in the evolution of genes and genomes.

Tobias Warnecke, Laurence D Hurst

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gene product diversity: adaptive or not?Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022
    Review
  4. Non-Darwinian Molecular Biology.Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. On the Origin of Compositional Features of Ribosomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Alternative splicing in tomato pollen in response to heat stress.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tobias WarneckeCentre for Genomic Regulation and UPF, Barcelona, Spain. tobias.warnecke@crg.eu
Laurence D Hurst

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why are short introns rarely a multiple of three nucleotides long? Why do essential genes cluster? Why are genes in operons often lined up in the order in which they are needed in the encoded pathway? In this Opinion article, we argue that these and many other - ostensibly disparate - observations are all pieces of an emerging picture in which multiple aspects of gene anatomy and genome architecture have evolved in response to error-prone gene expression.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenesGenomeAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID22094950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.