Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22094732›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2011

Identifying microbial fitness determinants by insertion sequencing using genome-wide transposon mutant libraries.

Andrew L Goodman, Meng Wu, Jeffrey I Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Markerless gene deletion inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Sedative choice altersInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Niche partitioning by resource size in the gut microbiome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew L GoodmanCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. andrew.goodman@yale.edu
Meng Wu
Jeffrey I Gordon

Funding

pan-Genome of E.coli in the bladder and gut of women with recurrent UTIP50DK064540 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HULTGREN, SCOTT J. · 2002 to 2017
$17.9M
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION - SMALL INTESTINER01DK030292 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY I GORDON, ANDREI L OSTERMAN · 1986 to 2026
$6.5M
GUT MICROBIOTA AND OBESITY: STUDIES IN GNOTOBIOTIC MICER01DK070977 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GORDON, JEFFREY I, HETTICH, ROBERT L. · 2005 to 2020
$6.3M
REGULATION OF GENE EXPRESSION IN THE SMALL INTESTINER37DK030292 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GORDON, JEFFREY I · 1993 to 2015
$4.0M
Corrinoid Response of the Human Gut MicrobiotaK01DK089121 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, ANDREW L · 2010 to 2014
$597k
The genetic determinants of symbiotic host-microbial interaction in the human gutF32AI078628 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, ANDREW L · 2008 to 2009
$97k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI078628NIAID NIH HHS F32AI078628NIDDK NIH HHS DK064540NIDDK NIH HHS DK30292NIDDK NIH HHS DK70977NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK089121NIDDK NIH HHS K01DK089121NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK064540NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK030292NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070977NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK030292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion sequencing (INSeq) is a method for determining the insertion site and relative abundance of large numbers of transposon mutants in a mixed population of isogenic mutants of a sequenced microbial species. INSeq is based on a modified mariner transposon containing MmeI sites at its ends, allowing cleavage at chromosomal sites 16-17 bp from the inserted transposon. Genomic regions adjacent to the transposons are amplified by linear PCR with a biotinylated primer. Products are bound to magnetic beads, digested with MmeI and barcoded with sample-specific linkers appended to each restriction fragment. After limited PCR amplification, fragments are sequenced using a high-throughput instrument. The sequence of each read can be used to map the location of a transposon in the genome. Read count measures the relative abundance of that mutant in the population. Solid-phase library preparation makes this protocol rapid (18 h), easy to scale up, amenable to automation and useful for a variety of samples. A protocol for characterizing libraries of transposon mutant strains clonally arrayed in a multiwell format is provided.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryMutationDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsMutagenesis, InsertionalPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID22094732
PMCPMC3310428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.