Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22094265›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2012

Characterizing complex structural variation in germline and somatic genomes.

Aaron R Quinlan, Ira M Hall

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Benchmark for simple and complex genome inversions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron R QuinlanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Ira M Hall
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Extent, Origin, and Control of Structural Variation in Mammalian GenomesDP2OD006493 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HALL, IRA M · 2009 to 2009
$2.3M
Rates and patterns of recurrent structural variation in the mouse genomeF32HG005197 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI QUINLAN, AARON R · 2009 to 2009
$68k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1F32HG005197-01NHGRI NIH HHS F32 HG005197NIH HHS DP2 OD006493NIH HHS DP2OD006493-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome structural variation (SV) is a major source of genetic diversity in mammals and a hallmark of cancer. Although SV is typically defined by its canonical forms (duplication, deletion, insertion, inversion and translocation), recent breakpoint mapping studies have revealed a surprising number of 'complex' variants that evade simple classification. Complex SVs are defined by clustered breakpoints that arose through a single mutation but cannot be explained by one simple end-joining or recombination event. Some complex variants exhibit profoundly complicated rearrangements between distinct loci from multiple chromosomes, whereas others involve more subtle alterations at a single locus. These diverse and unpredictable features present a challenge for SV mapping experiments. Here, we review current knowledge of complex SV in mammals, and outline techniques for identifying and characterizing complex variants using next-generation DNA sequencing.

Indexed as

Genomic Structural VariationGerm CellsAnimalsGenomicsHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22094265
PMCPMC3249479
OpenAlexW2042272913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.