Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22094046›Full record

ReviewBMC plant biology2011

Effects of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective.

Grant R Cramer, Kaoru Urano, Serge Delrot, Mario Pezzotti, Kazuo Shinozaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC plant biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 407 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
407citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

407 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Abiotic Stress in Crop Production.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Genome-Wide Analysis and Expression Profiles ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A Fructan 6-Exohydrolase fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

347 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grant R CramerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mail Stop 330, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA. cramer@unr.edu
Kaoru Urano
Serge Delrot
Mario Pezzotti
Kazuo Shinozaki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural environment for plants is composed of a complex set of abiotic stresses and biotic stresses. Plant responses to these stresses are equally complex. Systems biology approaches facilitate a multi-targeted approach by allowing one to identify regulatory hubs in complex networks. Systems biology takes the molecular parts (transcripts, proteins and metabolites) of an organism and attempts to fit them into functional networks or models designed to describe and predict the dynamic activities of that organism in different environments. In this review, research progress in plant responses to abiotic stresses is summarized from the physiological level to the molecular level. New insights obtained from the integration of omics datasets are highlighted. Gaps in our knowledge are identified, providing additional focus areas for crop improvement research in the future.

Indexed as

Plant DevelopmentPlant Physiological PhenomenaStress, PhysiologicalSystems BiologyCrops, AgriculturalEnvironmentMetabolomePlant Growth RegulatorsProteomeTranscriptomePlant Growth RegulatorsProteome

Identifiers

PMID22094046
PMCPMC3252258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.