Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22093229›Full record

ArticleProgress in molecular biology and translational science2011

Cell delivery of therapeutic nanoparticles.

JoEllyn McMillan, Elena Batrakova, Howard E Gendelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in molecular biology and translational science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Elucidation of Protonation Cooperativity of a STING-Activating Polymer.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA Dendrons as Agents for Intracellular Delivery.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

JoEllyn McMillanDepartment of Pharmacology and Experimental Neuroscience, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Elena Batrakova
Howard E Gendelman

Funding

VIRAL SHUTOFF OF HOST TRANSCRIPTION--PBCV-1 INFECTEDP20RR015635 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI WOOD, CHARLES · 2000 to 2009
$22.1M
Targeted Neuro Protection of HIV-1 Associated Neurologic DiseaseP01MH064570 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GELBARD, HARRIS A · 2001 to 2014
$19.4M
Neuroprotective Immunity and HIV DementiaR01NS034239 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Howard E Gendelman, R Lee Mosley · 1995 to 2026
$12.3M
Proteomics CoreP01NS043985 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOSKA, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 2003 to 2012
$11.8M
Role of EAAT2 and AEG-1 in Astrocyte Dysfunction and NeurodegenerationP01NS031492 · NINDS · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI FISHER, PAUL B · 1993 to 2007
$10.9M
Nanomedicine and NeuroAIDSR01NS036126 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GENDELMAN, HOWARD E · 1997 to 2017
$5.7M
Nebraska Center for VirologyP30GM103509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI WOOD, CHARLES · 2012 to 2014
$3.3M
Proteomic Strategies for AIDS and Drug Abuse - HIV and METH CNS SynergyP01DA026146 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CIBOROWSKI, PAWEL S · 2008 to 2010
$2.9M
Inflammatory Cells for Transport of Therapeutic Polypeptides Across the BBBR01NS057748 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BATRAKOVA, ELENA · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015635NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR15635NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA026146NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA026146NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103509NIMH NIH HHS P01 MH064570NIMH NIH HHS P01 MH64570NINDS NIH HHS 1R01 NS057748NINDS NIH HHS 2R01 NS034239NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS031492NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS043985NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS31492NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS43985NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034239NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036126NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057748NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS36126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicine seeks to manufacture drugs and other biologically relevant molecules that are packaged into nanoscale systems for improved delivery. This includes known drugs, proteins, enzymes, and antibodies that have limited clinical efficacy based on delivery, circulating half-lives, or toxicity profiles. The <100 nm nanoscale physical properties afford them a unique biologic potential for biomedical applications. Hence they are attractive systems for treatment of cancer, heart and lung, blood, inflammatory, and infectious diseases. Proposed clinical applications include tissue regeneration, cochlear and retinal implants, cartilage and joint repair, skin regeneration, antimicrobial therapy, correction of metabolic disorders, and targeted drug delivery to diseased sites including the central nervous system. The potential for cell and immune side effects has necessitated new methods for determining formulation toxicities. To realize the potential of nanomedicine from the bench to the patient bedside, our laboratories have embarked on developing cell-based carriage of drug nanoparticles to improve clinical outcomes in infectious and degenerative diseases. The past half decade has seen the development and use of cells of mononuclear phagocyte lineage, including dendritic cells, monocytes, and macrophages, as Trojan horses for carriage of anti-inflammatory and anti-infective medicines. The promise of this new technology and the perils in translating it for clinical use are developed and discussed in this chapter.

Indexed as

AnimalsCellsDiseaseDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanomedicineNanoparticlesVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID22093229
PMCPMC4016803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.