ReviewProgress in molecular biology and translational science2011
Engineered biological entities for drug delivery and gene therapy protein nanoparticles.
Review in Progress in molecular biology and translational science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomimetic peptide conjugates as emerging strategies for controlled release from protein-based materials.Drug delivery · 2025Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Inhaled Therapy: Improving Respiratory Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- RNAi Crop Protection Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Future perspectives on swine viral vaccines: where are we headed?Porcine health management · 2021Review
- Is it possible to ensure COVID19 vaccine supply by using plants?The Nucleus : an international journal of cytology and allied topics · 2021Article
- Liver-specific Gene Delivery Using Engineered Virus-Like Particles of Hepatitis E Virus.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- In vitro encapsulation of heterologous dsDNA into human parvovirus B19 virus-like particles.Molecular biotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of genetic engineering techniques has speeded up the growth of the biotechnological industry, resulting in a significant increase in the number of recombinant protein products on the market. The deep knowledge of protein function, structure, biological interactions, and the possibility to design new polypeptides with desired biological activities have been the main factors involved in the increase of intensive research and preclinical and clinical approaches. Consequently, new biological entities with added value for innovative medicines such as increased stability, improved targeting, and reduced toxicity, among others have been obtained. Proteins are complex nanoparticles with sizes ranging from a few nanometers to a few hundred nanometers when complex supramolecular interactions occur, as for example, in viral capsids. However, even though protein production is a delicate process that imposes the use of sophisticated analytical methods and negative secondary effects have been detected in some cases as immune and inflammatory reactions, the great potential of biodegradable and tunable protein nanoparticles indicates that protein-based biotechnological products are expected to increase in the years to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.