Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22092791›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

The importance of a multifaceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds.

Anne Han, Jonathan M Zenilman, Johan H Melendez, Mark E Shirtliff, Alessandra Agostinho, Garth James, Philip S Stewart, Emmanuel F Mongodin, Dhana Rao, Alexander H Rickard and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Host-Microbiome Crosstalk in Chronic Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Wound Microbiome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Biofilm and wound healing: from bench to bedside.European journal of medical research · 2023
    Review
  16. Bacterial biofilms in the human body: prevalence and impacts on health and disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Biofilm-Associated Infections in Chronic Wounds and Their Management.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anne HanDepartment of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ahan3@jhmi.edu
Jonathan M Zenilman
Johan H Melendez
Mark E Shirtliff
Alessandra Agostinho
Garth James
Philip S Stewart
Emmanuel F Mongodin
Dhana Rao
Alexander H Rickard
Gerald S Lazarus
Montana State University · USJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Research Infrastructure for the Hopkins Population CenterR24HD042854 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHERLIN, ANDREW J · 2003 to 2017
$5.1M
Healing Chronic Wounds by Controlling Microbial BiofilmP20GM078445 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI STEWART, PHILIP S · 2006 to 2009
$2.8M
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: in vitro and in vivo studiesR01AI069568 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHIRTLIFF, MARK E · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069568NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042854NIGMS NIH HHS 1P20GM078445-01NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM078445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds contain complex polymicrobial communities of sessile organisms that have been underappreciated because of limitations of standard culture techniques. The aim of this work was to combine recently developed next-generation investigative techniques to comprehensively describe the microbial characteristics of chronic wounds. Tissue samples were obtained from 15 patients with chronic wounds presenting to the Johns Hopkins Wound Center. Standard bacteriological cultures demonstrated an average of three common bacterial species in wound samples. By contrast, high-throughput pyrosequencing revealed increased bacterial diversity with an average of 17 genera in each wound. Data from microbial community profiling of chronic wounds were compared with published sequenced analyses of bacteria from normal skin. Increased proportions of anaerobes, Gram-negative rods and Gram-positive cocci were found in chronic wounds. In addition, chronic wounds had significantly lower populations of Propionibacterium compared with normal skin. Using epifluorescence microscopy, wound bacteria were visualized in highly organized thick confluent biofilms or as scattered individual bacterial cells. Fluorescent in situ hybridization allowed for the visualization of Staphylococcus aureus cells in a wound sample. Quorum-sensing molecules were measured by bioassay to evaluate signaling patterns among bacteria in the wounds. A range of autoinducer-2 activities was detected in the wound samples. Collectively, these data provide new insights into the identity, organization, and behavior of bacteria in chronic wounds. Such information may provide important clues to effective future strategies in wound healing.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsChronic DiseaseHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceQuorum SensingWound HealingWound InfectionWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID22092791
PMCPMC3227014
OpenAlexW2121068067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.