ArticleMolecular microbiology2012
Reflections on a sticky situation: how surface contact pulls the trigger for bacterial adhesion.
Article in Molecular microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adhesive Functions or Pseudogenization of Type Va Autotransporters inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Microbial Surface Colonization and Biofilm Development in Marine Environments.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016Review
- Type III secretion systems: the bacterial flagellum and the injectisome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- Programming controlled adhesion of E. coli to target surfaces, cells, and tumors with synthetic adhesins.ACS synthetic biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adhesion of bacterial cells to surfaces can be mediated by a wide variety of extracellular structures, which can either recognize specific molecular motifs or adhere in non-specific ways to multiple types of surfaces. The attachment is thought to be highly regulated, but the underlying sensory mechanism(s) are poorly understood. In the α-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus, the formation of adhesive organelles is 'hardwired' into the cell cycle regulatory circuitry. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Li et al. (2011) employed this model organism to examine the adhesion process and the transition from temporary to permanent attachment using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Surprisingly, they observed that adhesin production was not only under developmental control, but was also stimulated by surface contact. Initial reversible contact of the pili with the surface was followed by flagellum rotation arrest and subsequent induction of the holdfast to allow irreversible surface adhesion. These findings demonstrate that Caulobacter produces its holdfast only at the appropriate time for surface attachment, preventing premature export of the adhesin, which could then be inactivated by 'curing' or be masked by occluding particles. Importantly, their results support the notion that the flagellum serves as a mechanosensor for adhesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.