Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22092444›Full record

ArticleMolecular microbiology2012

Reflections on a sticky situation: how surface contact pulls the trigger for bacterial adhesion.

Clare L Kirkpatrick, Patrick H Viollier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adhesive Functions or Pseudogenization of Type Va Autotransporters inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  2. Microbial Surface Colonization and Biofilm Development in Marine Environments.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  3. Type III secretion systems: the bacterial flagellum and the injectisome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clare L KirkpatrickDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Patrick H Viollier
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adhesion of bacterial cells to surfaces can be mediated by a wide variety of extracellular structures, which can either recognize specific molecular motifs or adhere in non-specific ways to multiple types of surfaces. The attachment is thought to be highly regulated, but the underlying sensory mechanism(s) are poorly understood. In the α-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus, the formation of adhesive organelles is 'hardwired' into the cell cycle regulatory circuitry. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Li et al. (2011) employed this model organism to examine the adhesion process and the transition from temporary to permanent attachment using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Surprisingly, they observed that adhesin production was not only under developmental control, but was also stimulated by surface contact. Initial reversible contact of the pili with the surface was followed by flagellum rotation arrest and subsequent induction of the holdfast to allow irreversible surface adhesion. These findings demonstrate that Caulobacter produces its holdfast only at the appropriate time for surface attachment, preventing premature export of the adhesin, which could then be inactivated by 'curing' or be masked by occluding particles. Importantly, their results support the notion that the flagellum serves as a mechanosensor for adhesion.

Indexed as

Adhesins, BacterialCaulobacter crescentusAdhesins, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22092444
OpenAlexW1901270663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.