Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22092261›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2011

Robust identification of binding hot spots using continuum electrostatics: application to hen egg-white lysozyme.

David H Hall, Laurie E Grove, Christine Yueh, Chi Ho Ngan, Dima Kozakov, Sandor Vajda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the structural origins of cryptic sites on proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Focused grid-based resampling for protein docking and mapping.Journal of computational chemistry · 2016
    Article
  8. New Frontiers in Druggability.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2015
    Article
  9. Ligand deconstruction: Why some fragment binding positions are conserved and others are not.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. How proteins bind macrocycles.Nature chemical biology · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Protein interface remodeling in a chemically induced protein dimer.Journal of molecular recognition : JMR · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David H HallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Laurie E Grove
Christine Yueh
Chi Ho Ngan
Dima Kozakov
Sandor Vajda

Funding

Computational mapping of proteins for the binding of ligandsR01GM064700 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAJDA, SANDOR · 2003 to 2015
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM064700NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding hot spots, protein regions with high binding affinity, can be identified by using X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy to screen libraries of small organic molecules that tend to cluster at such hot spots. FTMap, a direct computational analogue of the experimental screening approaches, uses 16 different probe molecules for global sampling of the surface of a target protein on a dense grid and evaluates the energy of interaction using an empirical energy function that includes a continuum electrostatic term. Energy evaluation is based on the fast Fourier transform correlation approach, which allows for the sampling of billions of probe positions. The grid sampling is followed by off-grid minimization that uses a more detailed energy expression with a continuum electrostatics term. FTMap identifies the hot spots as consensus clusters formed by overlapping clusters of several probes. The hot spots are ranked on the basis of the number of probe clusters, which predicts their binding propensity. We applied FTMap to nine structures of hen egg-white lysozyme (HEWL), whose hot spots have been extensively studied by both experimental and computational methods. FTMap found the primary hot spot in site C of all nine structures, in spite of conformational differences. In addition, secondary hot spots in sites B and D that are known to be important for the binding of polysaccharide substrates were found. The predicted probe-protein interactions agree well with those seen in the complexes of HEWL with various ligands and also agree with an NMR-based study of HEWL in aqueous solutions of eight organic solvents. We argue that FTMap provides more complete information on the HEWL binding site than previous computational methods and yields fewer false-positive binding locations than the X-ray structures of HEWL from crystals soaked in organic solvents.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesChickensCrystallography, X-RayLigandsModels, MolecularMuramidaseNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingStatic Electricityhen egg lysozymeLigandsMuramidase

Identifiers

PMID22092261
PMCPMC3244821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.