Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22091464›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2011

Antileishmanial activity of a formulation of 2-n-propylquinoline by oral route in mice model.

N Campos Vieira, J Vacus, A Fournet, R Baudouin, C Bories, B Séon-Méniel, B Figadère, P M Loiseau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Investigational drugs for visceral leishmaniasis.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

N Campos VieiraGroupe Chimiothérapie Antiparasitaire, UMR 8076 CNRS, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Paris-Sud, Rue Jean-Baptiste, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France.
J Vacus
A Fournet
R Baudouin
C Bories
B Séon-Méniel
B Figadère
P M Loiseau
Université Paris-Sud · FRLaboratoire de Chimie · FRLaboratoire d'Énergétique Moléculaire et Macroscopique, Combustion · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2-n-propylquinoline is presently a drug-candidate for the treatment of visceral leishmaniosis in pre-clinical development. As this compound is in an oily state, it needs to be formulated and the objectives of this study are: to prepare a formulation; to demonstrate that the new salted formulation did not alter the activity of the active ingredient; and finally, that this activity was quite good compared to the reference oral drug, miltefosine. Therefore, a 2-n-propylquinoline formulation, as camphorsulfonic salt, was prepared and characterised. On the Leishmania donovani / Balb/c mice model, a treatment by oral route at 60 mmoles/kg/day for ten consecutive days with this formulation was compared to 2-n-propylquinoline alone and to miltefosine, the oral reference drug. The salt formulation did not alter the activity of the 2-n-propylquinoline. The formulation reduced the parasite burden of 76% compared to 89% for miltefosine (not significant). The characteristics of this formulation results in a suitable drugability of 2-n-propylquinoline for further studies.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDisease Models, AnimalLeishmania donovaniLeishmaniasis, VisceralMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPhosphorylcholineQuinolines2-propylquinolineAntiprotozoal AgentsmiltefosinePhosphorylcholineQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID22091464
PMCPMC3677589
OpenAlexW2119533859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.