Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22090409›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Validation of pncA gene sequencing in combination with the mycobacterial growth indicator tube method to test susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide.

Sami O Simons, Jakko van Ingen, Tridia van der Laan, Arnout Mulder, P N Richard Dekhuijzen, Martin J Boeree, Dick van Soolingen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prediction of pyrazinamide resistance inJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  4. Detection of Mutations inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evaluation of a novel line probe assay to detect resistance to pyrazinamide, a key drug used for tuberculosis treatment.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pyrazinamide Is a Two-Edged Sword: Do WHO Guidelines Matter?Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  13. Detection ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Using Reduced Inoculum Densities ofTuberculosis research and treatment · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sami O SimonsRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. s.simons@long.umcn.nl
Jakko van Ingen
Tridia van der Laan
Arnout Mulder
P N Richard Dekhuijzen
Martin J Boeree
Dick van Soolingen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyrazinamide is important in the treatment of tuberculosis. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of pyrazinamide resistance is hampered by technical difficulties. We hypothesized that mutation analysis combined with the mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) phenotypic method would be a good predictor of pyrazinamide resistance. We prospectively analyzed 1,650 M. tuberculosis isolates referred to our tuberculosis reference laboratory in 2008 and 2009. In our laboratory, the MGIT 960 system was used for pyrazinamide resistance screening. If a pyrazinamide-resistant strain was detected, we performed a pncA gene mutation analysis. A second MGIT 960 susceptibility assay was performed afterwards to evaluate the accuracy of the pncA mutation analysis to detect true- or false-positive MGIT results. We observed pyrazinamide resistance in 69 samples using the first MGIT 960 analysis. In a second MGIT 960 analysis, 47 of the 69 samples proved susceptible (68% false positivity). Sensitivity of nonsynonymous pncA mutations for detecting resistant isolates was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61% to 73%), and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 95% to 100%). A diagnostic algorithm incorporating phenotypic and molecular methods would have a 100% positive predictive value for detecting pyrazinamide-resistant isolates, indicating that such an algorithm, based on both methods, is a good predictor for pyrazinamide resistance in routine diagnostics.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAged, 80 and overAmidohydrolasesAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPyrazinamideSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNATuberculosisAmidohydrolasesAntitubercular AgentsPncA protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisPyrazinamide

Identifiers

PMID22090409
PMCPMC3264162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.