Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22090283›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2012

A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery.

W Daly, L Yao, D Zeugolis, A Windebank, A Pandit

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03673449 (A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Reconstruction of Digital Nerve Defects in Humans Using an Implanted Silk Nerve Guide), which is not on this map. Cited by 198 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
198citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03673449 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Reconstruction of Digital Nerve Defects in Humans Using an Implanted Silk Nerve Guide

TypeinterventionalSponsorSilk Biomaterials srlRan2019 to 2021Enrolled4ConditionsPeripheral Nerve Injury Digital Nerve HandArmsSilkBridge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

198 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 553 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

W DalyNetwork of Excellence for Functional Biomaterials (NFB), National University of Ireland, Newcastle Road, Dangan, Galway, Republic of Ireland.
L Yao
D Zeugolis
A Windebank
A Pandit
National University of Ireland · IEMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsurgical techniques for the treatment of large peripheral nerve injuries (such as the gold standard autograft) and its main clinically approved alternative--hollow nerve guidance conduits (NGCs)--have a number of limitations that need to be addressed. NGCs, in particular, are limited to treating a relatively short nerve gap (4 cm in length) and are often associated with poor functional recovery. Recent advances in biomaterials and tissue engineering approaches are seeking to overcome the limitations associated with these treatment methods. This review critically discusses the advances in biomaterial-based NGCs, their limitations and where future improvements may be required. Recent developments include the incorporation of topographical guidance features and/or intraluminal structures, which attempt to guide Schwann cell (SC) migration and axonal regrowth towards their distal targets. The use of such strategies requires consideration of the size and distribution of these topographical features, as well as a suitable surface for cell-material interactions. Likewise, cellular and molecular-based therapies are being considered for the creation of a more conductive nerve microenvironment. For example, hurdles associated with the short half-lives and low stability of molecular therapies are being surmounted through the use of controlled delivery systems. Similarly, cells (SCs, stem cells and genetically modified cells) are being delivered with biomaterial matrices in attempts to control their dispersion and to facilitate their incorporation within the host regeneration process. Despite recent advances in peripheral nerve repair, there are a number of key factors that need to be considered in order for these new technologies to reach the clinic.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsNerve RegenerationAnimalsAxonsCell MovementCellular MicroenvironmentGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresPeripheral NervesRatsRecovery of FunctionSchwann CellsSurface PropertiesBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID22090283
PMCPMC3243399
OpenAlexW2142254746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.