Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22089945›Full record

ReviewKidney international2012

Optimizing renal replacement therapy in older adults: a framework for making individualized decisions.

Manjula Kurella Tamura, Jane C Tan, Ann M O'Hare

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frailty in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review to Advance Its Clinical and Research Applications.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Vascular access placement and mortality in elderly incident hemodialysis patients.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Quality of life in older adults receiving hemodialysis: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manjula Kurella TamuraDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA. mktamura@stanford.edu
Jane C Tan
Ann M O'Hare
Stanford University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Renal senescence in kidney donorsK23DK087937 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TAN, JANE C · 2010 to 2014
$892k
Mechanisms of Cognitive Impairment in Chronic Kidney DiseaseK23AG028952 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KURELLA TAMURA, MANJULA · 2007 to 2011
$860k
Targeting Nephrology Referral Among Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney DiseaseK23AG028980 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI O'HARE, ANN M. · 2006 to 2009
$756k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028952NIA NIH HHS K23AG028952NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028980NIA NIH HHS K23AG028980NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK087937NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK087937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is often difficult to synthesize information about the risks and benefits of recommended management strategies in older patients with end-stage renal disease since they may have more comorbidity and lower life expectancy than patients described in clinical trials or practice guidelines. In this review, we outline a framework for individualizing end-stage renal disease management decisions in older patients. The framework considers three factors: life expectancy, the risks and benefits of competing treatment strategies, and patient preferences. We illustrate the use of this framework by applying it to three key end-stage renal disease decisions in older patients with varying life expectancy: choice of dialysis modality, choice of vascular access for hemodialysis, and referral for kidney transplantation. In several instances, this approach might provide support for treatment decisions that directly contradict available practice guidelines, illustrating circumstances when strict application of guidelines may be inappropriate for certain patients. By combining quantitative estimates of benefits and harms with qualitative assessments of patient preferences, clinicians may be better able to tailor treatment recommendations to individual older patients, thereby improving the overall quality of end-stage renal disease care.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalCatheterization, Central VenousDecision MakingHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationLife ExpectancyPatient PreferencePeritoneal DialysisPrecision MedicineRenal DialysisRenal Replacement TherapyRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID22089945
PMCPMC3396777
OpenAlexW2089881600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.