Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22089660›Full record

GuidelineEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2012

Proposal for the standardisation of multi-centre trials in nuclear medicine imaging: prerequisites for a European 123I-FP-CIT SPECT database.

John Caddell Dickson, Livia Tossici-Bolt, Terez Sera, Robin de Nijs, Jan Booij, Maria Claudia Bagnara, Anita Seese, Pierre Malick Koulibaly, Umit Ozgur Akdemir, Cathrine Jonsson and 6 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Dopamine transporter imaging for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single-siteEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2020
    Article
  8. Japanese multicenter database of healthy controls for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Standardisation and harmonisation boost the credibility of nuclear medicine procedures.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

John Caddell DicksonInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, London, UK. john.dickson@uclh.nhs.uk
Livia Tossici-Bolt
Terez Sera
Robin de Nijs
Jan Booij
Maria Claudia Bagnara
Anita Seese
Pierre Malick Koulibaly
Umit Ozgur Akdemir
Cathrine Jonsson
Michel Koole
Maria Raith
Markus Nowak Lonsdale
Jean George
Felicia Zito
Klaus Tatsch

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMulti-centre trials are an important part of proving the efficacy of procedures, drugs and interventions. Imaging components in such trials are becoming increasingly common; however, without sufficient control measures the usefulness of these data can be compromised. This paper describes a framework for performing high-quality multi-centre trials with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), using a pan-European initiative to acquire a normal control dopamine transporter brain scan database as an example.

methodsA framework to produce high-quality and consistent SPECT imaging data was based on three key areas: quality assurance, the imaging protocol and system characterisation. Quality assurance was important to ensure that the quality of the equipment and local techniques was good and consistently high; system characterisation helped understand and where possible match the performance of the systems involved, whereas the imaging protocol was designed to allow a degree of flexibility to best match the characteristics of each imaging device.

resultsA total of 24 cameras on 15 sites from 8 different manufacturers were evaluated for inclusion in our multi-centre initiative. All results matched the required level of specification and each had their performance characterised. Differences in performance were found between different system types and cameras of the same type. Imaging protocols for each site were modified to match their individual characteristics to produce comparable high-quality SPECT images.

conclusionA framework has been designed to produce high-quality data for multi-centre SPECT studies. This framework has been successfully applied to a pan-European initiative to acquire a healthy control dopamine transporter image database.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualNuclear MedicineTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTropanesClinical Trials as TopicEuropeHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality ControlReference Standards2-carbomethoxy-8-(3-fluoropropyl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)tropaneTropanes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.