Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22089264›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2011

Maturation outcomes are improved following Cryoleaf vitrification of immature human oocytes when compared to choline-based slow-freezing.

Catherine M H Combelles, S Temel Ceyhan, Haiyan Wang, Catherine Racowsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bisphenol-A and human oocyte maturation in vitro.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Female fertility: is it safe to "freeze?".Chinese medical journal · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after vitrification.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine M H CombellesBiology Department, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA. ccombell@middlebury.edu
S Temel Ceyhan
Haiyan Wang
Catherine Racowsky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe cryopreservation of immature oocytes permits oocyte banking for patients at risk of losing their fertility. However, the optimum protocol for such fertility preservation remains uncertain.

methodsThe present study investigated the survival, maturation, cytoskeletal and chromosome organization of sibling immature oocytes leftover from controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, that were either slow-frozen (with choline-substitution) or vitrified. A comparison group included oocytes that were never cryopreserved.

resultsAmong the three groups, comparable rates were observed for both survival (67-70%) and polar body extrusion (59-79%). Significantly more oocytes underwent spontaneous activation after IVM following slow-freezing compared with either vitrification or no cryopreservation. Likewise, the incidence of spindle abnormalities was greatest in the slow-frozen group, with no differences in spindle morphometrics or chromosome organization.

conclusionsWhile the overall incidence of mature oocytes with normal bipolar spindles from warmed immature oocytes was low, the yield using Cryoleaf vitrification was slightly superior to choline-based slow-freezing.

Indexed as

CholineActin CytoskeletonChromosomes, HumanCryopreservationHumansMicrotubulesOocytesVitrificationCholine

Identifiers

PMID22089264
PMCPMC3241844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.