Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22089251›Full record

ReviewEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2011

Understanding biomolecular motion, recognition, and allostery by use of conformational ensembles.

R Bryn Fenwick, Santi Esteban-Martín, Xavier Salvatella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Examining DNA breathing with pyDNA-EPBD.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The hairpin extension controls solvent access to the chromophore binding pocket in a bacterial phytochrome: a UV-vis absorption spectroscopy study.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Catalytic Site pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Hierarchical Graph Representation of Pharmacophore Models.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R Bryn FenwickJoint BSC-IRB Research Programme in Computational Biology, Institute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, Spain.
Santi Esteban-Martín
Xavier Salvatella

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the role conformational ensembles can play in the analysis of biomolecular dynamics, molecular recognition, and allostery. We introduce currently available methods for generating ensembles of biomolecules and illustrate their application with relevant examples from the literature. We show how, for binding, conformational ensembles provide a way of distinguishing the competing models of induced fit and conformational selection. For allostery we review the classic models and show how conformational ensembles can play a role in unravelling the intricate pathways of communication that enable allostery to occur. Finally, we discuss the limitations of conformational ensembles and highlight some potential applications for the future.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationMotionAllosteric RegulationBinding SitesDNAMolecular ConformationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsRNADNAProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID22089251
PMCPMC3222826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.