Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22088800›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2011

Retracted: Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial.

Roberto Bolli, Atul R Chugh, Domenico D'Amario, John H Loughran, Marcus F Stoddard, Sohail Ikram, Garth M Beache, Stephen G Wagner, Annarosa Leri, Toru Hosoda and 10 more

Retracted Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled TrialRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. It is linked to trial NCT00474461 (Myocardial Regeneration Using Cardiac Stem Cells Harvested From Right Atrial Appendages in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 610 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
610citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00474461 phase1completednot on this map

Myocardial Regeneration Using Cardiac Stem Cells Harvested From Right Atrial Appendages in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LouisvilleRan2009 to 2013Enrolled33ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Congestive Heart FailureArmsTreatment group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

610 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Heart-derived endogenous stem cells.Molecular biology reports · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Positive aspects of negative data.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2022
    Article
  14. Stem cell therapy for single ventricle congenital heart disease - current state and future directions.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Opportunities and challenges in stem cell therapy in cardiovascular diseases: Position standing in 2022.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Prototype device for endoventricular beta-emitting radiotracer detection and molecularly-guided intervention.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Cardiac cell therapy-Lost in translation?]Zeitschrift fur Herz-, Thorax- und Gefasschirurgie · 2022
    Review

550 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Roberto BolliDivisions of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. rbolli@louisville.edu
Atul R Chugh
Domenico D'Amario
John H Loughran
Marcus F Stoddard
Sohail Ikram
Garth M Beache
Stephen G Wagner
Annarosa Leri
Toru Hosoda
Fumihiro Sanada
Julius B Elmore
Polina Goichberg
Donato Cappetta
Naresh K Solankhi
Ibrahim Fahsah
D Gregg Rokosh
Mark S Slaughter
Jan Kajstura
Piero Anversa

Funding

Tumor Necrosis Factor Modulation of CPCsP01HL078825 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BOLLI, ROBERTO · 2005 to 2021
$37.6M
Repair and Angiogenesis by Stem Cells in Human HeartR37HL081737 · NHLBI · NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI ANVERSA, PIERO · 2005 to 2015
$6.5M
Coronary Vasculature Progenitor Cell in Human Ischemic Heart FailureR01HL039902 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANVERSA, PIERO, KAJSTURA, JAN · 1989 to 2012
$4.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078825NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL039902NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL081737NHLBI NIH HHS R37HL081737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundc-kit-positive, lineage-negative cardiac stem cells (CSCs) improve post-infarction left ventricular (LV) dysfunction when administered to animals. We undertook a phase 1 trial (Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic cardiOmyopathy [SCIPIO]) of autologous CSCs for the treatment of heart failure resulting from ischaemic heart disease.

methodsIn stage A of the SCIPIO trial, patients with post-infarction LV dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%) before coronary artery bypass grafting were consecutively enrolled in the treatment and control groups. In stage B, patients were randomly assigned to the treatment or control group in a 2:3 ratio by use of a computer-generated block randomisation scheme. 1 million autologous CSCs were administered by intracoronary infusion at a mean of 113 days (SE 4) after surgery; controls were not given any treatment. Although the study was open label, the echocardiographic analyses were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was short-term safety of CSCs and the secondary endpoint was efficacy. A per-protocol analysis was used. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00474461.

findingsThis study is still in progress. 16 patients were assigned to the treatment group and seven to the control group; no CSC-related adverse effects were reported. In 14 CSC-treated patients who were analysed, LVEF increased from 30·3% (SE 1·9) before CSC infusion to 38·5% (2·8) at 4 months after infusion (p=0·001). By contrast, in seven control patients, during the corresponding time interval, LVEF did not change (30·1% [2·4] at 4 months after CABG vs 30·2% [2·5] at 8 months after CABG). Importantly, the salubrious effects of CSCs were even more pronounced at 1 year in eight patients (eg, LVEF increased by 12·3 ejection fraction units [2·1] vs baseline, p=0·0007). In the seven treated patients in whom cardiac MRI could be done, infarct size decreased from 32·6 g (6·3) by 7·8 g (1·7; 24%) at 4 months (p=0·004) and 9·8 g (3·5; 30%) at 1 year (p=0·04).

interpretationThese initial results in patients are very encouraging. They suggest that intracoronary infusion of autologous CSCs is effective in improving LV systolic function and reducing infarct size in patients with heart failure after myocardial infarction, and warrant further, larger, phase 2 studies.

fundingUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation and National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

Coronary VesselsCombined Modality TherapyCoronary Artery BypassEchocardiography, DopplerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaMyocytes, CardiacPostoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID22088800
PMCPMC3614010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.