Trial reportLancet (London, England)2011
Retracted: Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. It is linked to trial NCT00474461 (Myocardial Regeneration Using Cardiac Stem Cells Harvested From Right Atrial Appendages in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 610 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Myocardial Regeneration Using Cardiac Stem Cells Harvested From Right Atrial Appendages in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.
Who cites it
610 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Optimal effectiveness of heart failure management - an umbrella review of meta-analyses examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce (re)hospitalizations in heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Cardiac Regeneration Over a 20-Year Period.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Dose Comparison Study of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (The TRIDENT Study).Circulation research · 2017Trial
- The Promise of Exosomes in Cardiac Repair: When 'Best Things Come in Small Packages'.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Heart-derived endogenous stem cells.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Review
- Cardiac progenitor cell therapy: mechanisms of action.Cell & bioscience · 2024Review
- Cell Therapy of Severe Ischemia in People with Diabetic Foot Ulcers-Do We Have Enough Evidence?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2023Article
- Uncovering the Heterogeneity of Cardiac Lin-KIT+ Cells: A scRNA-seq Study on the Identification of Subpopulations.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2023Article
- Article
- Unlocking the Pragmatic Potential of Regenerative Therapies in Heart Failure with Next-Generation Treatments.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Positive aspects of negative data.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2022Article
- Stem cell therapy for single ventricle congenital heart disease - current state and future directions.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022Review
- Opportunities and challenges in stem cell therapy in cardiovascular diseases: Position standing in 2022.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Review
- Myocardial regeneration protocols towards the routine clinical scenario: An unseemly path from bench to bedside.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Review
- Prototype device for endoventricular beta-emitting radiotracer detection and molecularly-guided intervention.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Fake It Till You Make It: What Every Translational Investigator Can Learn From the Rise and Fall of Theranos.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2022Article
- Exosomes and Exosomal Cargos: A Promising World for Ventricular Remodeling Following Myocardial Infarction.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Review
- [Cardiac cell therapy-Lost in translation?]Zeitschrift fur Herz-, Thorax- und Gefasschirurgie · 2022Review
550 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2019-03-14Investigation by Company/Institution · Unreliable Data · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) · · see also: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/the-lancet-retracts-cardiac-stem-cell-clinical-trial-paper-65598
- Expression of concern · 2014-04-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Investigation by Company/Institution · Updated to Retraction ·
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Expression of concern
- Retracted
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundc-kit-positive, lineage-negative cardiac stem cells (CSCs) improve post-infarction left ventricular (LV) dysfunction when administered to animals. We undertook a phase 1 trial (Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic cardiOmyopathy [SCIPIO]) of autologous CSCs for the treatment of heart failure resulting from ischaemic heart disease.
methodsIn stage A of the SCIPIO trial, patients with post-infarction LV dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%) before coronary artery bypass grafting were consecutively enrolled in the treatment and control groups. In stage B, patients were randomly assigned to the treatment or control group in a 2:3 ratio by use of a computer-generated block randomisation scheme. 1 million autologous CSCs were administered by intracoronary infusion at a mean of 113 days (SE 4) after surgery; controls were not given any treatment. Although the study was open label, the echocardiographic analyses were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was short-term safety of CSCs and the secondary endpoint was efficacy. A per-protocol analysis was used. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00474461.
findingsThis study is still in progress. 16 patients were assigned to the treatment group and seven to the control group; no CSC-related adverse effects were reported. In 14 CSC-treated patients who were analysed, LVEF increased from 30·3% (SE 1·9) before CSC infusion to 38·5% (2·8) at 4 months after infusion (p=0·001). By contrast, in seven control patients, during the corresponding time interval, LVEF did not change (30·1% [2·4] at 4 months after CABG vs 30·2% [2·5] at 8 months after CABG). Importantly, the salubrious effects of CSCs were even more pronounced at 1 year in eight patients (eg, LVEF increased by 12·3 ejection fraction units [2·1] vs baseline, p=0·0007). In the seven treated patients in whom cardiac MRI could be done, infarct size decreased from 32·6 g (6·3) by 7·8 g (1·7; 24%) at 4 months (p=0·004) and 9·8 g (3·5; 30%) at 1 year (p=0·04).
interpretationThese initial results in patients are very encouraging. They suggest that intracoronary infusion of autologous CSCs is effective in improving LV systolic function and reducing infarct size in patients with heart failure after myocardial infarction, and warrant further, larger, phase 2 studies.
fundingUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation and National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.