Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22088022›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2011

Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.

Jonathan A Kopechek, Kevin J Haworth, Jason L Raymond, T Douglas Mast, Stephen R Perrin, Melvin E Klegerman, Shaoling Huang, Tyrone M Porter, David D McPherson, Christy K Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative Frequency-Domain Passive Cavitation Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jonathan A KopechekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, 2901 Campus Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA. jonathan.kopechek@gmail.com
Kevin J Haworth
Jason L Raymond
T Douglas Mast
Stephen R Perrin
Melvin E Klegerman
Shaoling Huang
Tyrone M Porter
David D McPherson
Christy K Holland

Funding

Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis for Stroke TherapyR01NS047603 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HOLLAND, CHRISTY K. · 2004 to 2018
$7.5M
Echogenic Targeted Liposomes:Transfection/Drug DeliveryR01HL074002 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2004 to 2013
$5.3M
TARGETED LIPOSOMES FOR ACOUSTIC CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGINGR01HL059586 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 1998 to 2012
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL059586NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL074002NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL74002NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are used clinically to aid detection and diagnosis of abnormal blood flow or perfusion. Characterization of UCAs can aid in the optimization of ultrasound parameters for enhanced image contrast. In this study echogenic liposomes (ELIPs) were characterized acoustically by measuring the frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter coefficients at frequencies between 3 and 30 MHz using a broadband pulse-echo technique. The experimental methods were initially validated by comparing the attenuation and backscatter coefficients measured from 50-μm and 100-μm polystyrene microspheres with theoretical values. The size distribution of the ELIPs was measured and found to be polydisperse, ranging in size from 40 nm to 6 μm in diameter, with the highest number observed at 65 nm. The ELIP attenuation coefficients ranged from 3.7  ±  1.0 to 8.0  ±  3.3 dB/cm between 3 and 25 MHz. The backscatter coefficients were 0.011  ±  0.006 (cm str)(-1) between 6 and 9 MHz and 0.023 ± 0.006 (cm str)(-1) between 13 and 30 MHz. The measured scattering-to-attenuation ratio ranged from 8% to 22% between 6 and 25 MHz. Thus ELIPs can provide enhanced contrast over a broad range of frequencies and the scattering properties are suitable for various ultrasound imaging applications including diagnostic and intravascular ultrasound.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaLiposomesUltrasonicsElasticityMicrospheresModels, TheoreticalParticle SizePolystyrenesPressureReproducibility of ResultsScattering, RadiationSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTransducers, PressureUltrasonography, InterventionalContrast MediaLiposomesPolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID22088022
PMCPMC3248067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.