Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22087790›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2011

Characteristics, practice patterns, and outcomes in patients with acute hypertension: European registry for Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (Euro-STAT).

Alain Vuylsteke, Jean-Louis Vincent, Didier Payen de La Garanderie, Frederick A Anderson, Leigh Emery, Allison Wyman, Sophie Rushton-Smith, Joel M Gore, Euro-STAT Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Patients with Hypertensive Emergencies: Implication for Risk Stratification.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [The hypertensive emergency situation : Recommendations for initial drug therapy management].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Review
  5. Point-of-care ultrasound in the management of shock: what is the optimal prescription?Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Management of hypertensive crises in the elderly.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2018
    Review
  8. Therapeutic Approach to Hypertension Urgencies and Emergencies in the Emergency Room.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2018
    Review
  9. What's new with hypertensive crises?Intensive care medicine · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimal perioperative management of arterial blood pressure.Integrated blood pressure control · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Year in review 2011: Critical Care--Cardiology.Critical care (London, England) · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alain VuylstekeDepartment of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB23 3RE, UK. a.vuylsteke@nhs.net
Jean-Louis Vincent
Didier Payen de La Garanderie
Frederick A Anderson
Leigh Emery
Allison Wyman
Sophie Rushton-Smith
Joel M Gore
Euro-STAT Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough effective strategies are available for the management of chronic hypertension, less is known about treating patients with acute, severe elevations in blood pressure. Using data from the European registry for Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (Euro-STAT), we sought to evaluate 'real-life' management practices and outcomes in patients who received intravenous antihypertensive therapy to treat an episode of acute hypertension.

methodsEuro-STAT is a European, hospital-based, observational study of consecutive adult patients treated with intravenous antihypertensive therapy while in the emergency department, perioperative unit or ICU. Enrolment took place between 1 July and 15 October 2009 in 11 hospitals in 7 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom).

resultsThe study population was composed of 791 consecutive patients (median age 69 years, 37% women). Median arterial blood pressure before treatment was 166 mmHg systolic blood pressure (IQR 141 to 190 mmHg) and 80 mmHg diastolic blood pressure (IQR 68 to 95). Nitroglycerine was the most commonly used antihypertensive treatment overall (40% of patients), followed by urapidil (21%), clonidine (16%) and furosemide (8%). Treatment was associated with hypotension in almost 10% of patients. Overall 30-day mortality was 4%, and new or worsening end-organ damage occurred in 19% of patients.

conclusionsHigh blood pressure requiring intravenous therapy is currently managed with a variety of agents in Europe, with those most commonly used being nitroglycerine, urapidil and clonidine. Patients with acute hypertension have substantial concomitant morbidity and mortality, and intravenous antihypertensive treatment is associated with hypotension in almost 10% of cases.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureClonidineEmergency Service, HospitalEuropeFemaleFurosemideHospital MortalityHumansHypertensionInfusions, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedAntihypertensive AgentsClonidineFurosemideNitroglycerinPiperazinesurapidil

Identifiers

PMID22087790
PMCPMC3388647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.