ArticleExpert review of proteomics2011
Proteome profiling for the identification of lung cancer signatures.
Article in Expert review of proteomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of clinical proteomics in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Clinical and translational medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive and in-depth discovery of the disease proteome is an important issue in recent proteomics developments. Previous studies have shown a number of biomarkers discovered in various diseases, including lung cancer. Some of them are potentially useful in lung cancer diagnostics and prognostics. However, few of them can act as organ-specific biomarkers to extensively compare multiple cancer models. This article evaluates a recently published study employing comparative proteomics on multiple genetically engineered mouse models and sheds light on the usefulness and application of the discovered marker panel for human lung cancer diagnostics.
Identifiers
22087654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.